Hai cercato la traduzione di quid adhuc et ego da Latino a Inglese

quid adhuc in arca est
tell me what to do

et ego bona
i will give to you, and tell me everything, and i am the good things, come,

et ego amare
you shorn

et ego non possum
i can't

et ego natus sum nemo
i was born in

at ille dixit adhuc et vos sine intellectu esti
and jesus said, are ye also yet without understanding?

dilectus meus mihi et ego illi
my beloved and i to him who feeds among the lilies

et ego natus sum ad staturam.
i come

manete in me,et ego in vobis
stay in your

i magnus cornu et ego non mentior
i like big ass and i cannot lie

tu es asinus, et ego virgas habeo
you are a donkey/ass, et i have a stick

o, te ipsum quaerēbam! – et ego te.
c / o, you are looking for - i you.

et quid adhuc dicam deficiet enim me tempus enarrantem de gedeon barac samson iepthae david et samuhel et propheti
and what shall i more say? for the time would fail me to tell of gedeon, and of barak, and of samson, and of jephthae; of david also, and samuel, and of the prophets:

si mortui estis cum christo ab elementis mundi quid adhuc tamquam viventes in mundo decerniti
wherefore if ye be dead with christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,

tunc princeps sacerdotum scidit vestimenta sua dicens blasphemavit quid adhuc egemus testibus ecce nunc audistis blasphemia
then the high priest rent his clothes, saying, he hath spoken blasphemy; what further need have we of witnesses? behold, now ye have heard his blasphemy.

et ego audivi et non intellexi et dixi domine mi quid erit post hae
and i heard, but i understood not: then said i, o my lord, what shall be the end of these things?

si ergo consummatio per sacerdotium leviticum erat populus enim sub ipso legem accepit quid adhuc necessarium secundum ordinem melchisedech alium surgere sacerdotem et non secundum ordinem aaron dic
if therefore perfection were by the levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron?