Hai cercato la traduzione di select 2 objects that are the sa... da Spagnolo a Inglese

yes, they are the same size.
yes, they are the same size.

financial variables that are the subject of this
financial variables that are the subject of this

i'm not sure these two are the same.
i'm not sure these two are the same.

they are the same as those in s27(3).
3.

the cotton fibres used for banknotes are the same as those used for the production of textiles for clothing.
las fibras de algodón utilizadas para los billetes son idénticas a las que se emplean en la confección de tejidos para vestuario.

of the six cases, the nominative and accusative are the same, and the genitive and dative are the same, meaning that nouns have four distinct forms for case.
of the six cases, the nominative and accusative are the same, except for personal pronouns, and the genitive and dative are the same, meaning that nouns have four distinct forms for case.

in the event that two numbers are equally low (for example, if s was at (2,5)), pick a random direction - the lengths are the same.
in the event that two numbers are equally low (for example, if s was at (2,5)), pick a random direction – the lengths are the same.

==tracklisting y formatos==these are the formats and track listings of major single releases of "never be the same again".
==formats and track listings==these are the formats and track listings of major single releases of "never be the same again".

for example, the following:translates to:as you can see, there is also a little bit of operator precedence happening here, and the precedence levels are the same as with the c precedence levels.
for example, the following:translates to:as you can see, there is also a little bit of operator precedence happening here, and the precedence levels are the same as with the c precedence levels.

however, care must be taken in using these results, since a more complex model with more parameters will always have a higher likelihood than a simplified version of the same model, which can lead to the naive selection of models that are overly complex.
however, care must be taken in using these results, since a more complex model with more parameters will always have a higher likelihood than a simplified version of the same model, which can lead to the naive selection of models that are overly complex.

first, we can 'black out' the rows on the countries that are irrelevant to us: patents applications (per million habitants) 2017 population 2016 2017 2018 2019 (thousands) luxembourg 590 651 674 622 655 now, we should obtain the population figure in 2016 and 2019. this is not difficult, if you have read well the statement. at this point, i would like to remind our reader that, quite often (as we have already seen in several examples), epso numerical reasoning questions include in their statement not only the 'question asked' but aiso essential information or new data, apart from those contained in tables and charts, that you will also need to do your calculations. it is not rare that, when the candidate is too focused in analysing and performing arithmetic with many figures from the tables and graphics -in the heat battle the test and time-, he/she may forget or miss an important data from the statement, so please be aware of this potential mistake. so, having the 2017 population, 590 thousands, and knowing that there is an increase of 12 thousands per year (we should work with the same unit and it is faster here to skip the zeroes), we can get that: population in 2016 (1 year before) was 590 - 12 = 578 thousands - population in 2019 (2 years later) was 590 - (12 * 2) = 614 thousands 60
excuse me just