Hai cercato la traduzione di you lose meaning da Tagalog a Inglese

Tagalog

Traduttore

you lose meaning

Traduttore

Inglese

Traduttore
Traduttore

Traduci istantaneamente testi, documenti e voce con Lara

Traduci ora

Contributi umani

Da traduttori professionisti, imprese, pagine web e archivi di traduzione disponibili gratuitamente al pubblico.

Aggiungi una traduzione

Tagalog

Inglese

Informazioni

Tagalog

the more you lose the more you gain

Inglese

the more you lose the more you gain

Ultimo aggiornamento 2024-03-15
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Tagalog

what make you lose interest in things

Inglese

what make you lose interest in things

Ultimo aggiornamento 2021-06-16
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

what activities make you lose track of time

Inglese

anong mga aktibidad ang nawawalan ka ng oras sa pagsubaybay

Ultimo aggiornamento 2021-09-07
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

onece you lose me im unreachable, unavailabe,un

Inglese

im unreachable, unavailabe,un interested

Ultimo aggiornamento 2024-09-19
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

it was a good game, you win some, you lose some.

Inglese

it was a good game, you win some, you lose some

Ultimo aggiornamento 2022-06-06
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

once you lose me, you will never find another me.

Inglese

once you lose me, you will never find another me

Ultimo aggiornamento 2022-06-25
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

it 's not over when you lose,its over when you quit.

Inglese

it not over when you lose,its over when you quit

Ultimo aggiornamento 2022-03-19
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

take risks if you win you will be happy if you lose you will be wiser.

Inglese

take risks if you win you will be happy if you lose you will be wiser

Ultimo aggiornamento 2024-03-16
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

what if you lose me, what would be the hardest thing to move on from??

Inglese

what if you lost me, what would be the hardest thing to move on from??

Ultimo aggiornamento 2025-01-18
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

if you lose me one day remember me by lookin at me to the moon and the sound waves.

Inglese

if you lose me one day remember me by looking at

Ultimo aggiornamento 2023-06-17
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

``whatever you lose, you'll find it again. but what you throw away, you'll never get back.

Inglese

``whatever you lose, you'll find it again. but what you throw away, you'll never get back.

Ultimo aggiornamento 2025-01-23
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo

Tagalog

ipagpalagay na ang iyong frontline ay 1m heroic fighter at 5m gladiator 5 teammates na nagpapatibay sa iyo ng 200k gladiators bawat isa ang iyong attacker ay umabot sa pinagsamang puwersa (ganap na gamit ang iyong mga istatistika) at ipagpalagay na ito ay nagpaparami ng 1.2m casualties laban sa infantry frontline. ang mga nasawi ay itinalaga bilang mga sumusunod: nawala mo ang 1m gladiators. ang mga nasugatan ay itinalaga sa anumang puwang ng infirmary na mayroon ka, at anumang bagay na namatay (ang pinakamataas na makakamit na puwang ng infirmary ay kasalukuyang 761,600 kaya ang isang bagay ay mamamatay na walang banigsuppose your frontline is 1m heroic fighter and 5m gladiator 5 teammates reinforce you with 200k gladiators each your attacker hits the combined force (entirely using your stats) and suppose it inflicts 1.2m casualties against the infantry frontline. the casualties are assigned as follows: you lose 1m gladiators. wounded are assigned to whatever infirmary space you have available, and anything else dies (max achievable infirmary space is currently 761,600 - so something is going to die no matter how you designed your turf) your teammates each take 40k casualties, which probably just go to their infirmary. now suppose you designed your frontline differently, and had 2.7m heroic fighter and 1m gladiators (very roughly the same fighting strength as the above mix, but way more costly) 5 teammates reinforce you with 200k gladiators each your attacker hits and maybe inflicts 1.1m casualties - this is because once they beat half of a given tier troop in your frontline, they start hitting the next higher available tier. well, t4s are tougher to kill, so your attackers won't likely take down as many. total wounds on your force now look like 100k heroic fighters and 1m gladiators. wounds are allocated as follows: you - 100k heroic fighters + 500k gladiators. this might fit neatly in your infirmary, but those t4s are expensive to heal. at this point, maybe your t2 meatshield is a bit too thin. teammates - 100k gladiators each. they absorb a lot more casualties this way, but your t2 line ended up thin enough overall for your attacker to hit some t4s. so if you're taking t2 reinforcements, the more t2s you already have, the less their t2s will be able to save yours from dying, but you also want to have enough t2s that your t4s aren't too easily hit in one rally. now let's suppose we reinforced with 1m t4s from your guildmates in the above cases. your opponent wouldn't do as much damage to you, since your fighting strength is just that much stronger by having the better reinforcements, so let's assume that they manage to deal about 900k casualties with this adjustment to combat stats. if you built either configuration, your losses are going to be entirely t2s, but you'd have some dead ones. it's much less likely you'll end up burned in this scenario (which is great if you're holding prisoners), but repeated rallys will be more likely to eventually grind you down. so, in a nutshell, if they aren't hitting you for more than your infirmary space after reinforcing, i'd take the t4s, heal, and get ready for the next hit. if they're hitting you for more than your infirmary space, i'd take t2s, but training 5m seems to be too much (unless you're going for a "deceptively low might" trap - but at 1m t4 + 5m t2 of each, you're already holding 228m troop might!). i'd be inclined to shift the ratio towards having a few more t4s to make t2 reinforcements more viable against more dangerous attackers.

Inglese

suppose your frontline is 1m heroic fighter and 5m gladiator 5 teammates reinforce you with 200k gladiators each your attacker hits the combined force (entirely using your stats) and suppose it inflicts 1.2m casualties against the infantry frontline. the casualties are assigned as follows: you lose 1m gladiators. wounded are assigned to whatever infirmary space you have available, and anything else dies (max achievable infirmary space is currently 761,600 - so something is going to die no matter how you designed your turf) your teammates each take 40k casualties, which probably just go to their infirmary. now suppose you designed your frontline differently, and had 2.7m heroic fighter and 1m gladiators (very roughly the same fighting strength as the above mix, but way more costly) 5 teammates reinforce you with 200k gladiators each your attacker hits and maybe inflicts 1.1m casualties - this is because once they beat half of a given tier troop in your frontline, they start hitting the next higher available tier. well, t4s are tougher to kill, so your attackers won't likely take down as many. total wounds on your force now look like 100k heroic fighters and 1m gladiators. wounds are allocated as follows: you - 100k heroic fighters + 500k gladiators. this might fit neatly in your infirmary, but those t4s are expensive to heal. at this point, maybe your t2 meatshield is a bit too thin. teammates - 100k gladiators each. they absorb a lot more casualties this way, but your t2 line ended up thin enough overall for your attacker to hit some t4s. so if you're taking t2 reinforcements, the more t2s you already have, the less their t2s will be able to save yours from dying, but you also want to have enough t2s that your t4s aren't too easily hit in one rally. now let's suppose we reinforced with 1m t4s from your guildmates in the above cases. your opponent wouldn't do as much damage to you, since your fighting strength is just that much stronger by having the better reinforcements, so let's assume that they manage to deal about 900k casualties with this adjustment to combat stats. if you built either configuration, your losses are going to be entirely t2s, but you'd have some dead ones. it's much less likely you'll end up burned in this scenario (which is great if you're holding prisoners), but repeated rallys will be more likely to eventually grind you down. so, in a nutshell, if they aren't hitting you for more than your infirmary space after reinforcing, i'd take the t4s, heal, and get ready for the next hit. if they're hitting you for more than your infirmary space, i'd take t2s, but training 5m seems to be too much (unless you're going for a "deceptively low might" trap - but at 1m t4 + 5m t2 of each, you're already holding 228m troop might!). i'd be inclined to shift the ratio towards having a few more t4s to make t2 reinforcements more viable against more dangerous attackers.

Ultimo aggiornamento 2022-07-20
Frequenza di utilizzo: 1
Qualità:

Riferimento: Anonimo
Attenzione: contiene formattazione HTML nascosta

Ottieni una traduzione migliore grazie a
8,862,910,117 contributi umani

Ci sono utenti che chiedono aiuto:



I cookie ci aiutano a fornire i nostri servizi. Utilizzando tali servizi, accetti l'utilizzo dei cookie da parte nostra. Maggiori informazioni. OK