プロの翻訳者、企業、ウェブページから自由に利用できる翻訳レポジトリまで。
componente
komponenta
最終更新: 2013-01-06
使用頻度: 4
品質:
componente g dsa
dsa komponenta g
最終更新: 2012-04-11
使用頻度: 1
品質:
componente actual:
trenutna komponenta
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
componente g de dsa
dsa komponenta g
最終更新: 2012-04-11
使用頻度: 1
品質:
nombre del componente:
ime komponente:
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 2
品質:
gamma (componente azul)
gamma (plava komponenta)
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
componente de documentación html
komponenta za html dokumentaciju
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
gamma (componente verde)
gamma (zelena komponenta)
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
ajustar tamaño del componente
veličina komponente uklapanja
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
lista de auditoría (componente)
lista inventara (komponente)
最終更新: 2013-01-06
使用頻度: 1
品質:
& acerca del componente de editor
ugradivi komponenta za uređivanje
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
警告:見えない HTML フォーマットが含まれています
color del papel (componente rojo)
boja papira (crvena komponenta)
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
componente empotrable para multipart/ mixedname
ugradiva komponenta za višedijelni mimename
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
componente de gráficos escalables de kofficename
comment
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
color de la página (componente azul)
boja papira (plava komponenta)
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
componentes
solution: by reading the question and chart data, we observe that they provide us with full information about the household composition in france in 2000 and partial information about its change in 2010. we must use that figures to calculate the percentage of family units with no children in 2010. let us go step-by-step to solve this question, because its calculations are quite simple, but it contains a big pitfall (very common in epso questions) that we will explain too. first sentence of the question's statement says: in france, the percentage of family units with children decreased by 20% between 2000 and 2010. we can easily verify that the only country appearing in the question and chart is france, so no problem here about possible confusion with data from other countries. we should obtain the percentage of family units with children in 2000, to reduce it by 20% for 2010, according to this sentence. so, looking at the chart data, we are able to calculate this percentage, and we have two ways to do it: adding up the percentages of family units with 1, 2, 3, 4 or more children: 20% + 30% + 20% + 10% = 80% subtracting the percentage of family units with no children (20%) from the total (100%), which is faster: 100% - 20% = 80% even though the calculations are simple in this case and you could use both 99
最終更新: 2021-03-16
使用頻度: 1
品質:
参照: