검색어: plea of inapplicability (영어 - 슬로베니아어)

finding of inapplicability
ugotavljanje neuporabe

plea of lack of jurisdiction
ugovor nepristojnosti

the commission raised a plea of inadmissibility.
komisija je podala ugovor nedopustnosti tožbe.

commission v council of a plea of illegality, the inapplicability of a regulation of a general or legislative nature.
komisija proti svetu z ugovorom nezakonitosti lahko sklicuje na to, da se uredba, ki ima splo�ni ali normativni značaj, ne uporablja.

14 on the other hand, a plea of illegality is not a
1415/2004, temveč členi 3, 4 in 6 uredbe �t. 1954/2003.

however, this is not a plea of inadmissibility strictly speaking.
vendar pri tem ne gre za ugovor nedopustnosti v dejanskem po menu.

admissibility of the plea of illegality of the contested joint action ........
dopustnost ugovora nezakonitosti spornega skupnega ukrepa ...........

the plea of inadmissibility, alleging irregularity of the pre-litigation procedure
ugovor nedopustnosti, ki izhaja iz domnevne nepravilnosti predhodnega postopka

39 both parties were thus certain that an implicit plea of illegality had been raised.
obema strankama je bilo torej jasno, da je bil vložen implicitni ugovor nezakonitosti.

in those cases, the plea of inadmissibility alleged lack of standing of the applicants.
i-2945, točka 18) in sodba sodi�ča z dne 24. marca 1993 v zadevi cirfs proti komisiji (c-313/90, recueil, str. i-1125, točka 23).

b — whether the plea of illegality raised by the kingdom of spain is well founded
– določitev biolo�ko občutljivega območja, ki je opredeljeno v členu 6(1) uredbe �t.

i do not therefore consider it appropriate to apply that caselaw by analogy to the plea of illegality.
menim, da te sodne prakse po analogiji ni mogoče uporabiti pri ugovoru nezakonitosti.

admissibility of a plea of illegality raised by a privileged applicant against a regulation pursuant to article 241 ec .................
dopustnost ugovora nezakonitosti na podlagi člena 241 es, na katerega se zoper uredbo sklicuje privilegirana tožeča stranka ....

a plea of illegality raised by a member state in regard to a regulation does not infringe the principle of res judicata
ugovor nezakonitosti neke uredbe, na katerega se sklicuje država članica, ne kr�i načela pravnomočnost, ki velja za

in this opinion, i will explain, first, why that plea of illegality should, in my opinion,
v teh sklepnih predlogih bom najprej razložil, zakaj menim, da je treba ta ugovor

in my opinion, that circumstance prevents the plea of illegality from being regarded as out of time and declared inadmissible on that ground.
menim, da ta okoli�čina nasprotuje temu, da bi bilo ta ugovor nezakonitosti mogoče �teti za prepoznega in ga zato razglasiti za nedopustnega.

existing aid measures for the benefit of tieliikelaitos consisting of inapplicability of bankruptcy legislation, inapplicability of normal corporate income tax and the fiscal aid measure related to land purchase by tieliikelaitos are not compatible with the common market.
veljavni ukrepi pomoči, ki se izvajajo v korist podjetju tieliikelaitos, tj. neuporaba stečajne zakonodaje, neuporaba običajnega davka od dobička pravnih oseb in davčni ukrep pomoči za nakup zemlje s strani podjetja tieliikelaitos, niso skladni s skupnim trgom.

that judgment introduced into the relationship between the action for annulment and the plea of illegality a rationale based on the principle that legal remedies should be mutually compensatory.
s to sodbo je bila med ničnostno tožbo in ugovorom nezakonitosti vzpostavljena logika nadome�čanja pravnih sredstev 18. sodi�če je s tem, da je dopustnost ugovora nezakonitosti pogojevalo z neobstojem drugega pravnega sredstva, ugovoru nezakonitosti pripisalo subsidiaren značaj 19.

(ii) admissibility of a plea of illegality raised against a joint action adopted on the basis of title v of the eu treaty.
ii) dopustnost ugovora nezakonitosti, ki se uveljavlja zoper skupni ukrep, sprejet na podlagi naslova v pogodbe eu

furthermore, even if the plea of inadmissibility which it advanced before the court of first instance had itself been inadmissible, the court should have made an express finding to that effect.
Čeprav bi bil ugovor nedopustnosti, ki ga je uveljavljala pred sodi�čem prve stopnje, nedopusten, bi slednje moralo to izrecno ugotoviti.