검색어: componente (스페인어 - 크로아티아어)

componente
komponenta

componente g dsa
dsa komponenta g

componente actual:
trenutna komponenta

componente g de dsa
dsa komponenta g

nombre del componente:
ime komponente:

gamma (componente azul)
gamma (plava komponenta)

componente de documentación html
komponenta za html dokumentaciju

gamma (componente verde)
gamma (zelena komponenta)

ajustar tamaño del componente
veličina komponente uklapanja

lista de auditoría (componente)
lista inventara (komponente)

& acerca del componente de editor
ugradivi komponenta za uređivanje

color del papel (componente rojo)
boja papira (crvena komponenta)

componente empotrable para multipart/ mixedname
ugradiva komponenta za višedijelni mimename

componente de gráficos escalables de kofficename
comment

color de la página (componente azul)
boja papira (plava komponenta)

componentes
solution: by reading the question and chart data, we observe that they provide us with full information about the household composition in france in 2000 and partial information about its change in 2010. we must use that figures to calculate the percentage of family units with no children in 2010. let us go step-by-step to solve this question, because its calculations are quite simple, but it contains a big pitfall (very common in epso questions) that we will explain too. first sentence of the question's statement says: in france, the percentage of family units with children decreased by 20% between 2000 and 2010. we can easily verify that the only country appearing in the question and chart is france, so no problem here about possible confusion with data from other countries. we should obtain the percentage of family units with children in 2000, to reduce it by 20% for 2010, according to this sentence. so, looking at the chart data, we are able to calculate this percentage, and we have two ways to do it: adding up the percentages of family units with 1, 2, 3, 4 or more children: 20% + 30% + 20% + 10% = 80% subtracting the percentage of family units with no children (20%) from the total (100%), which is faster: 100% - 20% = 80% even though the calculations are simple in this case and you could use both 99