검색어: risky (영어 - 타갈로그어)

risky
risky

risk, risky
ilonggo

faking risky
faking risky

he decided to do so after failing to find a publisher for his ‘risky’ novel.
napagpasyahan niyang gawin ito matapos mabigong makahanap nang maglalahathala para sa kanyang "mapanganib" na nobela.

in the absence of alternative options, working parents often leave children alone when schools close and this can lead to risky behaviours, including increased influence of peer pressure and substance abuse.
sa kawalan ng mga alternatibong opsyon, ang mga nagtatrabaho na magulang ay madalas na iniiwan ang mga bata kapag sarado ang mga paaralan at maaaring humantong ito sa mga mapanganib na pag-uugali, kabilang ang pagtaas ng impluwensyang presyur ng kapantay at pag-abuso sa sangkap.

if a model is simpler and can also explain differential security prices, it will be considered a superior theory to the capm. investors possess quadratic utility functions, normally distributed security returns, and a market portfolio that contains all risky assets.
kung ang isang modelo ay mas simple at maaari ring ipaliwanag ang mga pagkakaiba-iba ng mga presyo ng seguridad, ito ay maituturing na isang superior teorya sa capm. ang mga namumuhunan ay nagtataglay ng mga function na quadratic utility, karaniwang namamahagi ng mga pagbabalik sa seguridad, at isang portfolio ng merkado na naglalaman ng lahat ng mga mapanganib na assets.

a) 1/5 = 0.20 b) 1/6 = 0.166 c) 2/11 = 0.1818 d) 11/20 = 0.55 e) 2/9 = 0.222 as you can see, the closest fraction to our result, 0.188, is 2/11, so the right choice for this question is option c). my advice considering how close are options a) and c), it would be too risky taking round figures in this exercise, e.g., 3.5 and 6 million for the population, and 56 100, 20 700 and 28 200 for the gdp per capita. besides, as in the previous exercise, we would not gain much time by doing so. on the other hand, we could also convert every option into percentage format, but note that this is not necessary at al with our original result, 0.188, so it would be a waste of our (always valuable) time. 76
region population gdp per (millions) capita (eur) brussels 1.0 56 104 wallonia 3.4 20 670 flanders 6.1 28 241 (excluding brussels) first, we can calculate the gdp of brussels, which is: 1.0 million persons * 56 104 eur/person = 56 104 million eur note that we have cleared the magnitude 'persons' in both the numerator and the denominator, in the way that we already know. then, we obtain the total gdp of belgium, by adding the gdps of every region: brussels (already calculated): 56 104 million eur wallonia: 3.4 million persons * 20 670 eur/person = 70 278 million eur flanders (excluding brussels): 6.1 million persons * 28 241 eur/person = = 172 270. 1 million eur total gdp: 56 104 + 70 278 + 172 270. 1 = 298 652. 1 million eur so now we can get the share of brussels in this total: 56 104 / 298 652. 1 = 0.188 => 18.8% in percentage format, but we do not even need it for this exercise. which is closest fraction among the available options to answer this question? apart from the first alternative, they are not very easy to calculate mentally, so you can use your calculator to make sure: 75