Je was op zoek naar: ambidexterity (Engels - Duits)

ambidexterity
beidhändigkeit

ambidexterity has been removed.
'beidhändigkeit' wurde entfernt.

also worth noting here is the removal of ambidexterity.
weiterhin beachtenswert ist die entfernung der passiven fähigkeit 'beidhändigkeit'.

corporalita: the cultivation of ambidexterity, fitness, and poise
corporalita: die kultivierung von beidhändigkeit, fitness und haltung

of short stature, he is quick and strong on the ball, and his passing range is enhanced by his ambidexterity.
außerdem ist er schwer vom ball zu trennen und überrascht regelmäßig mit kreativen sowie genauen pässen in die spitze.

failure to achieve ambidexterity, balance and straightness creates problems in performance, a shorter useful life and eventually leads to unsoundness.
werden ambidextrie, gleichgewicht und geraderichtung nicht erreicht, führt dies zu leistungseinbußen, einem kürzeren nutzleben und schließlich zu gesundheitlichen problemen.

recall ambidexterity is a person, equally fluent in right and left hand, indicating that uniform, symmetrical development of both hemispheres of the brain.
daran erinnern beidhändigkeit ist eine person, in rechte und linke hand gleichermaßen fließend, die anzeigt, dass gleichmäßige, symmetrische entwicklung der beiden hemisphären des gehirns.

exploration of green technologies in smes: the role of ambidexterity, domain separation and commercialization . in: proceedings of the ispim innovation conference, budapest, june 2015
exploration of green technologies in smes: the role of ambidexterity, domain separation and commercialization . in: proceedings of the ispim innovation conference, budapest, june 2015

abstract this article seeks to reconceptualize the relationship between flexibility and efficiency. much organization theory argues that efficiency requires bureaucracy, that bureaucracy impedes flexibility, and that organizations therefore confront a tradeoff between efficiency and flexibility. some researchers have challenged this line of reasoning, arguing that organizations can shift the efficiency/flexibility tradeoff to attain both superior efficiency and superior flexibility. others have pointed out numerous obstacles to successfully shifting the tradeoff. seeking to advance our understanding of these obstacles and how they might be overcome, we analyze an auto assembly plant that appears to be far above average industry performance in both efficiency and flexibility. nummi, a toyota subsidiary located in fremont, california, relied on a highly bureaucratic organization to achieve its high efficiency. analyzing two recent major model changes, we find that nummi used four mechanisms to support its exceptional flexibility/efficiency combination. first, metaroutines (routines for changing other routines) facilitated the efficient performance of nonroutine tasks. second, both workers and suppliers contributed to nonroutine tasks while they worked in routine production. third, routine and nonroutine tasks were separated temporally, and workers switched sequentially between them. finally, novel forms of organizational partitioning enabled differentiated subunits to work in parallel on routine and nonroutine tasks. nummi's success with these four mechanisms depended on several featureso f the broadero rganizationaclo ntext,m ost notablyt raining, trust, and leadership. (flexibility; bureaucracy; tradeoffs; routines; metaroutines; ambidexterity; switching; partitioning; trust) introduction the postulate of a tradeoff between efficiency and flexibility is one of the more enduring ideas in organizational theory. thompson (1967, p. 15) described it as a central "paradox of administration." managers must choose between organization designs suited to routine, repetitive tasks and those suited to nonroutine, innovative tasks. however, as competitive rivalry intensifies, a growing number of firms are trying to improve simultaneously in efficiency- and flexibility-related dimensions (de meyer et al. 1989, volberda 1996, organization science 1996). how can firms shift the terms of the efficiency-flexibility tradeoff?
zusammenfassung dieser artikel versucht, die beziehung zwischen flexibilität und effizienz neu zu erfassen. viele organisationstheorien argumentieren, dass effizienz bürokratie erfordert, dass bürokratie flexibilität behindert und dass organisationen daher mit einem kompromiss zwischen effizienz und flexibilität konfrontiert sind. einige forscher haben diese argumentation in frage gestellt und argumentiert, dass unternehmen den kompromiss zwischen effizienz und flexibilität verschieben können, um sowohl überlegene effizienz als auch überlegene flexibilität zu erreichen. andere haben