Je was op zoek naar: timelimit (Engels - Maltees)

timelimit for bringing an action
terminu għall-preżentata ta’ rikors

this timelimit may not be extended.
dan itterminu ma jistax jiġi pprorogat.

the timelimit for lodging a response shall not be extended.
dan itterminu għarrisposta ma jistax jiġi pprorogat.

in the absence of an opinion within that timelimit, the council may act.
fl-assenza ta' opinjoni f'dak it-terminu, lkunsill jista' jaġixxi.

any request sent by the president to an agency shall include a timelimit for response.
kull talba li tintbagħat millpresident lill-aġenzija għandha tinkludi limitu ta' żmien li fih tingħata tweġiba.

if necessary, parliament may set a new timelimit pursuant to rule 175(5).
jekk ikun meħtieġ, ilparlament jista' jistabbilixxi data ta' skadenza ġdida skond lartikolu 175(5).

upon expiry of the timelimit, the absence of an opinion shall not prevent further action.
ma' l-iskadenza tatterminu taż-żmien, in-nuqqas ta' opinjoni m'għandux iżomm milli tittieħed azzjoni ulterjuri.

that timelimit may be very short in extremely urgent cases, in particular on public health grounds.
il-limitu ta' żmien jista’ jkun qasir ħafna f'każi tassew urġenti, b'mod partikolari għal raġunijiet ta' saħħa pubblika.

failure by the institution to reply within the prescribed timelimit shall entitle the applicant to make a confirmatory application.
jekk listituzzjoni tonqos li twieġeb fiżżmien stipulat tkun qed tagħti ddritt lill-applikant li jagħmel applikazzjoni ta' konferma.

the timelimit laid down in paragraph 1 of this article may be extended by the president on a reasoned application by the defendant.
jekk irrikorrent ikun persuna ġuridika rregolata mid-dritt privat, huwa għandu jehmeż mar-rikors tiegħu:

the european parliament shall deliver its opinion within a timelimit which the council may set depending on the urgency of the matter.
ilparlament ewropew għandu jagħti lopinjoni tiegħu f'limitu ta' żmien li lkunsill jista' jistabbilixxi skond lurġenza tal-kwistjoni.

the timelimit laid down in paragraph 1 may, in exceptional circumstances, be extended by the president on a reasoned application by the defendant.
itterminu previst filparagrafu 1 ta’ dan lartikolu jista’ jiġi pprorogat millpresident fuq talba motivata tal-konvenut.

if other committees wish to deliver opinions, the president shall set the timelimit within which these shall be communicated to the committee responsible.
ilpresident għandu jiffissa d-data ta' skadenza sa meta l-kumitati li jixtiequ jagħtu lopinjoni tagħhom għandhom jgħaddu l-imsemmija opinjoni lillkumitat kompetenti.

after the statement in intervention has been lodged, the president shall, where necessary, prescribe a timelimit within which the parties may reply to that statement .
f’dan ilkaż, jekk ilpresident jilqa’ ttalba għal intervent, lintervenjent jista’ jippreżenta losservazzjonijiet tiegħu, waqt ilproċedura orali, jekk din tinżamm.

(b) where no reply or no rejoinder has been lodged within the timelimit fixed in accordance with article 41(2); or
jekk ilproċedura orali tinfetaħ mingħajr istruttorja, ilpresident tal-kulleġġ ġudikanti għandu jistabbilixxi ddata meta għandha tinfetaħ.

(b) where no reply or no rejoinder has been lodged within the timelimit fixed in accordance with article 47(2), or
ilqorti Ġenerali tista’ f'kull fażi talproċedura, wara li tisma’ lavukat Ġenerali, tiddeċiedi dwar kull miżura fir-rigward ta’ lorganizzazzjoni talproċedura jew ta’ l-istruttorja previsti flartikoli 64 u 65 jew tordna s-sostituzzjoni jew l-estensjoni ta’ kull att istruttorju.

by contrast, as recalled in the order in sgl carbon v commission, cited above, a measure which merely confirms a previous decision not contested within the timelimit for initiating proceedings is not a reviewable act.
minn naħa loħra, kif ġie mfakkar fl-ordnitad-29ta’april2004,sgl carbon vs ilkummissjoni (t-308/02, li għadu ma ġiex ippubblikat filĠabra), att li huwa jikkonferma biss deċiżjoni preċedenti li saret definittiva,m’huwiexattkontestabbli.danhuwal-każ ta’ att li ma jinkludi ebda element ġdid meta pparagunat mad-deċiżjoni preċedenti u li ma jkunx ġie preċedut minn rieżami tassitwazzjoni tad-destinatarju ta’ din iddeċiżjoni.

section 1 — third-party proceedings indicate the nature of the evidence to show that there are facts justifying revision of the judgment, and that the timelimit laid down in article 98 has been observed.
l-ewwel taqsima– fuq l-oppożizzjoni minn terzi d)

in exceptional cases, for example in the event of an application relating to a very long document or to a very large number of documents, the timelimit provided for in paragraph 1 may be extended by 15 working days, provided that the applicant is notified in advance and that detailed reasons are given.
f’każi eċċezzjonali, per eżempju filkaż ta’ applikazzjoni dwar dokument twil ħafna jew dwar numru kbir ta’ dokumenti, id-data ta' skadenza stipulata filparagrafu 1 tista’ tiġi estiża bi 15il ġurnata tax-xogħol, sakemm lapplikant jiġi avżat minn qabel u jingħataw raġunijiet dettaljati.

( v ) agreements covering fields to which either the ordinary legislative procedure applies , or the special legislative procedure where consent by the european parliament is required . the european parliament and the council may , in an urgent situation , agree upon a timelimit for consent .
paragrafu 2 , bilformulazzjoni ta » l-artikolu 212 għandu jiddaħħal . fl-artikolu 219 , l-ewwel subparagrafu , il-kliem « ta » l-għadd tal-membri skond l-artikolu 213 » għandhom jiġu ssostitwiti bi « tal-membri tagħha » u t-tieni subparagrafu għandu jiġi ssostitwit bi « ir-regoli ta » proċedura tiegħu għandhom jiddeterminaw il-quorum ."