Je was op zoek naar: instantiated (Engels - Russisch)

instantiated
Инстанция

a class that cannot be directly instantiated.
Класс, для которого нельзя непосредственно создать экземпляры объектов.

abstract class a class that cannot be directly instantiated.
абстрактный класс Класс, для которого нельзя непосредственно создать экземпляры Руководство пользователя по

for spbm, each permutation is instantiated as a distinct b-vid.
Для spbm каждая перестановка экземпляров — отличный b-vid.

type " {0}" cannot be instantiated, it is not a concrete cla
Невозможно создать экземпляр типа " {0}" , это не класс

as such the instantiated method expects that these two values are passed to the constructor.
Метод ожидает, что эти два значения будут переданы конструктору.

many of them can be instantiated and configured for a particular device using setup monitoring profile action.
Многие из них можно реализовать и настроить для определенного устройства при помощи действия Установить профиль мониторинга.

a concrete class is a class that can be instantiated, as opposed to abstract classes, which cannot.
Практически класс может пониматься как некий шаблон, по которому создаются объекты — экземпляры данного класса.

real locale name from which the collation data comes. if the collator was instantiated from rules or an error occurred, returns boolean false.
Возвращает true в случае успешного завершения или false в случае возникновения ошибки.

and these things, because we can copy and transmit them so easily, actually circulate within our culture a lot more like ideas than like physically instantiated objects.
Объект, который легко скопировать и передать, ассоциируется в нашем общественном сознании скорее с идеей, нежели чем с физическим воплощением.

when the type is instantiated through com, the .net clr is the actual com object that executes and it merely marshals any method calls or property access to the type implementation.
В то время как тип порождается через com, .net clr — действительный объект com, выполняющий и маршализирующий любой вызов метода или реализующий доступ к реализации типов.

the form layer wasn't written as the required io services (stardiv.uno.io.*) could not be instantiated.
Не записан слой формы, так как не удалось создать экземпляр службы io (stardiv.uno.io.*).

the form layer wasn't loaded as the required io-services (stardiv.uno.io.*) could not be instantiated.
Не загружен слой формы, так как не удалось создать экземпляр службы io (stardiv.uno.io.*).

i think back to the previous question, you were asking about, all those things are getting instantiated, the other thing that scopes do is they worry about memory management, so that you don't have memory leak
Я думаю, на предыдущий вопрос, вы спрашивали о том, все эти вещи являются получение экземпляра, другое дело, что областей сделать это они беспокоиться об управлении памятью, так что не нужно утечки памяти. Поэтому, я бы сказал, что вам нужно загрузить ваши фрагменты через нг включить вместо innerhtml

latin grammarian priscian defined interjections as "a part of speech signifying an emotion by means of an unformed word" (padley 1976:266). muller (1862) thought that interjections were at the limit of what might be called language. sapir (1921:6-7) said that they were "the nearest of all language sounds to instinctive utterance." bloomfield (1984[1933]:177) said that they "occur under a violent stimulus," and jakobson (1960:354) considered them exemplars of the "purely emotive stratum of language." while interjections are no longer considered peripheral to linguistics and are now carefully defined with respect to their grammatical form, their meanings remain vague and elusive. in particular, although interjections are no longer characterized purely in terms of emotion, they are still characterized in termsof "mental states." for example, wierzbicka ( 1992 :164) characterizes interjections as "[referring] to the speaker's current mental state or mental act." ameka (1992a:107) says that "from a pragmatic point of view, interjections may be defined as a subset of items that encode speaker attitudes and communicative intentions and are context-bound," and montes (1999:1289) notes that many interjections "[focus] on the internal reaction of affectedness of the speaker with respect to the referent." philosophers have offered similar interpretations. for example, herder thought that interjections were the human equivalent of animal sounds, being both a "language of feeling" and a "law of nature" (1966:88), and rousseau, pursuing the origins of language, theorized that proto-language was "entirely interjectional" (1990:71). indeed, such philosophers have posited a historical transition from interjections to language in which the latter allows us not only to index pain and express passion but also to denote values and exercise reason (d'atri 1995).2 thus interjections have been understood as a semiotic artifact of our natural origins and the most transparent index of our emotions. such an understanding of interjections is deeply rooted in western thought. aristotle (1984), for example, posited a contrastive relationship between voice, proper only to humans as instantiated in language, and sound, shared by humans and animals as instantiated in cries. this contrastive relation was then compared with other analogous contrastive relations, in particular, value and pleasure/pain, polis and household, and bios (the good life, or political life proper to humans) and zoe (pure life, shared by all living things). such a contrast is so pervasive that modern philosophers such as agamben (1995) have devoted much of their scholarly work to the thinking out of this tradition and others built on it such as idversus ego in the freudian paradigm. in short, the folk distinction made between interjections and language 2. d'atri (1995:124) argues that, for rousseau, " interjections . . .are sounds and not voices: they are passive registerings and as such do not presuppose the intervention of will, which is what characterizes human acts of speech." 468 f current anthropology volume 44, number 4, august-october 2003 proper maps onto a larger set of distinctions in western thought: emotion and cognition, animality and humanity, nature and culture, female and male, passion and reason, bare life and the good life, pain and value, private and public, and so on (see, e.g., lutz 1988, strathern1988).
тьфу