Je was op zoek naar: explanation (Turks - Engels)

explanation
explanation

"the fall of the roman empire: the military explanation".
"the fall of the roman empire: the military explanation".

please see the gettext documentation from your system for a thorough explanation of these functions.
this extension has no configuration directives defined in php.ini.

this code may be passed to socket_strerror() to get a textual explanation of the error.
socket_create() returns a socket resource on success, or false on error.

-- an explanation of the relations between the superpowers in the 20th century based on the notion of recognition.
– an explanation of the relations between the superpowers in the 20th century based on the notion of recognition.

geçici gönderme dizini oluşturulamadı:% 1% 1 is the importer keyword,% 2 is keyword explanation
could not create temporary upload folder: %1

* "psychological explanation", random house, 1968, isbn 0-07-021412-3.
* "psychological explanation", random house, 1968, isbn 0-07-021412-3.

the usual explanation, the two-source hypothesis, is that mark was written first and that the authors of matthew and luke relied on mark and the hypothetical q document.
the usual explanation, the two-source hypothesis, is that mark was written first and that the authors of matthew and luke relied on mark and the hypothetical q document.

finally, some authors have suggested that social control theory may provide an alternative explanation for the differential treatment received by stereotypical and counter-stereotypical defendants observed in previous research (saulters-tubbs, 1993). social control theory proposes that behaviour is controlled within society by external pressures to conform to socially accepted norms and values (van krieken et al., 2000). for example, it would be expected that defendants in general would be viewed negatively for deviating from acceptable standards for social behaviour. social control theory attributes the harsher treatment of counter-stereotypical offenders to dual punishment, that is, punishment for their violation of accepted norms for appropriate behaviour and punishment for their violation of a specific stereotype (saulters-tubbs, 1993).
the measure assessing categorisation as a typical murder also provided some tentative support for this prediction, with the feminine defendant being seen as less like a typical murderer compared to the masculine defendant, but only when the defendant was a woman. while the pairwise comparison was significant, the interaction was not statistically significant despite the effect size being the same size as the significant effect for the defendant gender.