Você procurou por: non hazardous waste (Inglês - Hindi)

guidelines for common hazardous waste incineration
सामान्य खतरनाक अपशिष्ट भस्मीकरण के लिए दिशानिर्देश

hazardous wastes
खतरनाक कचरा

s60: this material and its container must be disposed of as hazardous waste
s60: यह पदार्थ तथा इसके मर्तबान को खतरनाक कचरा के रूप में ठिकाने लगाया जाना चाहिएplease take the official translations! you find them here: http: // europa. eu. int/ eur- lex/ lex/ lexuriserv/ lexuriserv. do? uri=celex: 32001l0059: en: html

no licence is required for storing non hazardous goods .
गैर - खतरनाक वस्तुएं बिना लायसेन्स के गोदाम में रखी जा सकती हैं ।

the proposed draft rules would repeal the hazardous waste rules , 1989 and amendments thereof .
प्रस्तावित प्रारूप नियमावली , 1989 को संशोधित किया जा चुका है ।

a fresh draft notification of hazardous waste management rules has been published on 28th september , 2007 for seeking public comments .
आम जनता की टिप्प्णी प्राप्तक करने के लिए 28 सितंबर , 2007 को घातक अपशिष्टि प्रबंधन नियमावली की नई प्रारूप अधिसूचना प्रकाशित की गई है ।

also , peaceful and non - hazardous environment is responsible for successful operation of these units .
शांत और गैर जोखिम पूर्ण परिवेश भी इन इकाइयों के सफलतापूर्वक प्रचालन के लिए उत्तरदायी है ।

basel convention on transboundary movement of hazardous wastes and their disposal
खतरनाक अपशिष्ट पदार्थ और उनके निपटान के सीमा पार संचलन पर बेसल समझौता

separate set of laws for emission of hazardous wastes have also been enacted .
आपदा जनक अपशिष्ट के उत्सर्जन के लिए अलग कानून के सैट भी अधिनियमित किए गए हैं ।

the convention aims at checking the reported illegal traffic in hazardous wastes from one country to another .
इस समझौते का लक्ष्य एक देश से दूसरे देश में खतरनाक कचरे में कथित अवैध व्यापार पर नियंत्रण करना है ।

oily cotton waste and drum haphazardly deposited near torpedo heating station at lrs. it is coming under hazardous waste,which is proper storage as per guidelines of norm and avoid contaminated on the ground /soil.
तेल कपास के कचरे और ड्रम haphazardly lrs में टारपीडो हीटिंग स्टेशन के पास जमा। यह खतरनाक कचरे के रूप में आ रहा है, जो आदर्श के दिशानिर्देशों के अनुसार उचित भंडारण है और जमीन / मिट्टी पर दूषित होने से बचता है।

the division is also responsible for planning , overseeing and implementation of the policies and programmes on the management of chemical emergencies and hazardous substances including hazardous wastes .
यह प्रभाग घातक अपशिष्टर सहित रासायनिक आपात स्थिितियों और घातक पदार्थों के प्रबंधन पर नीतियों एंव कार्यक्रमों की आयोजना , निगरानी एवं क्रियान्वतयन के लिए भी जिम्मे दार है ।

the mandate of this division is to promote safety in the management and use of hazardous substances including hazardous chemicals and hazardous wastes with an objective to prevent and mitigate damage to health and environment due to hazardous chemicals and wastes .
इस प्रभाग का अधिदेश घातक रसायनों एवं अपशिष्टोंह के कारण स्वाास्य्न एवं पर्यावरण की क्षति की रोकथाम एवं उपशमन के लिए घातक रसायन एवं घातक अपशिष्टा सहित घातक पदार्थों के प्रबंधन एवं प्रयोग में सुरक्षा को बढ़ावा देना है ।

india is a signatory to the unep - sponsored convention on control of transboundary movement of hazardous wastes , which was adopted at basel , switzerland , by 126 governments of the world in 1989 .
पीछला पेज होम पेज अगला पेज पीछला पेज होम पेज अगला पेज संयुक्त राष्ट्र पर्यावरण संरक्षण द्वारा 1989 में बेसल स्विट्जरलैंड में प्रायोजित खतरनाक कचरे की सीमा पार आवाजाही नियंत्रण संधि पर हस्ताक्षर करने वाले विश्व के 126 देशों में भारत भी शाम है ।

human interference with our environment is excessive, and the situation is rapidly worsening due to our population growth. policies must therefore be changed. these policies affect basic economic, technological, and ideological structures. the way to these policy changes is in the “deep ecology” ecosophy (110). deep ecology is a philosophical way of looking at our environmental problems that was founded in 1972 by norwegian arne naess, a former head of the philosophy department at the university of oslo. naess’ writings show us what is wrong with the world and give us a blueprint by which we can bring about change. in its most basic form, deep ecology is a necessary wisdom, requiring humans to see themselves as part of the bigger picture. that picture is our sacred relationship with earth and all beings. many believe overpopulation, the greenhouse effect, global warming, and loss of habitat are no cause for alarm. some, in fact, claim media and politicians perpetuate the hysteria regarding our environmental decline because they have something to gain by painting such a bad picture. countless studies i have read or am personally involved with, however, have convinced me these problems are real and can be resolved if the following are supported: 1. continued inquiry into the appropriate human roles on our planet. 2. root cause analysis of unsustainable practices. 3. reduction of human consumption. 4. conservation and restoration of ecosystems. 5. a life of committed action for earth. (oslo 1973) the solution to our ecosystem mess is through the principles dr. naess has developed. these principles begin with a statement that all life, human and nonhuman, has intrinsic value. this means everything about life is valuable, including individuals, cultures, species, habitats, and populations. another principle states that the diversity of life forms contribute to our appreciation of their value, but these forms also have value in and of themselves. a person with first hand experience, or one who works in the ecological field, is mindful of the live-and-let-live axiom but, unfortunately, most relate this only to humans. naess makes it another principle that humans have no right to reduce riches, resources, and diversity of life, except to fulfill vital needs. human interference with the nonhuman world is out of control and getting worse (drengson). . therefore, the another principle requires strategies be put in place for the first-world nations to overcome delusions and laziness on these issues the next principle requires a major change in the policies that affect our economic, technologic and ideological norms. our society's values are geared toward wealth and technological advancement, which result in reckless buying and careless disposal of our mass waste (burton 2002). we need to appreciate life’s quality instead of what society sets as standards. this is the next principle, but the notion is difficult to characterize since quality of life cannot be quantified. the last principle simply states that if you believe in what deep ecology teaches, then you should do your best to employ those changes. as you can see, the fundamental principles of deep ecology outlined in arne naess’ writings demand radical changes in our life. changes that affect our population growth, hazardous waste, and global warming dilemmas must include birth control, recycling, and yielding sustainable resources for energy and building. population growth drives or multiplies most of our environmental problems. between 1900 and 1999, world population quadrupled. just between 1960 and 1999 it more than doubled, from three billion to over six billion and currently, we are growing more than 80 million people every year (2002 world population data sheet). this growth means more energy and resource needs, more land occupied, and more waste. as population and consumption increase, there are fewer resources available per person. at some point, there are not enough resources to go around, and scarcity occurs. resource scarcity is the root of many problems. if there are not enough resources to adequately support the population, poverty results. greater environmental destruction occurs, as people are forced to over-exploit the resource base (burton 2002). scarcity leads to discrimination, because when resources are scarce, someone gets less. girls, women, ethnic or religious minorities, the poor, and the elderly are most often victims of this (population reference bureau 2002). scarcity also leads to migration, conflict between bands, tribes or nations as they fight to obtain resources. this has been evidenced by the aztec people’s demise. we should teach the deep ecology philosophy in school when the kids are small. this will ensure that our earth’s future will be in the hands of humans who have appreciation of our world and its inhabitants, living and nonliving. it will teach harmony instead of killing and dominance because deep ecology discards the survival of the fittest concept. (oslo 1973) in closing, the earth is a living entity that is being snuffed-out by too many people. selfishness and egocentricity is rampant and these attitudes need to be changed. the deep ecology philosophy, if made available to the world will do this. just as philosophies taught by aristotle, hume, and kant have open the door to new thinking, so can naess beliefs.
पर्यावरण की मराठी निबंध महत्व