Você procurou por: evolutionary (Inglês - Tagalo)

evolutionary
ebolusyon

evolutionary psychology
sikolohiya ng ebolusyon

the evolutionary origin of mers-cov from bats is known at its initial identification and has also been strengthened by subsequent findings.
ang ebolusyon na pinagmulan ng mers-cov mula sa mga paniki ay natukoy sa paunang pagkakakilala dito at pinalakas din ng mga kasunod na natuklasan.

an animal serves as the evolutionary host of an hcov if it harbours a closely related ancestor sharing high homology at the level of nucleotide sequence.
ang isang hayop ay nagsisilbing isang pang-ebolusyong host ng isang hcov kung ito ay magkakaroon ng malapit na nauugnay na ninuno na nagbabahagi ng mataas na homology sa antas ng pagkakasunod-sunod ng nucleotide.

multiple lines of evidence support an evolutionary origin of all hcovs from bats, where viruses are well adapted and non-pathogenic but show great genetic diversity.
ang maraming linya ng katibayan ay sumusuporta sa isang ebolusyon na pinagmulan ng lahat ng mga hcov mula sa mga paniki, kung saan ang mga virus ay mahusay na umaangkop at hindi pathogen ngunit nagpapakita ng mahusay na genetic na pagkakaiba-iba.

before discussing the animal origins of hcovs, it will serve us well to discuss the definitions and characteristics of evolutionary, natural, reservoir, intermediate and amplifying hosts of hcovs.
bago pag-usapan ang mga pinagmulang hayop ng hcov, makakatulong sa atin na talakayin ang mga kahulugan at katangian ng ebolusyon, likas na reservoir, tagapamagitan at mga nagpapalakas na host ng mga hcov.

continued investigations in this area will elucidate the evolutionary pathway of sars-cov-2 in animals, with important implications in the prevention and control of covid-19 in humans.
ang patuloy na mga pagsisiyasat sa bahaging ito ay magpapaliwanag sa landas ng ebolusyon ng sars-cov-2 sa mga hayop, na may mahalagang mga implikasyon sa pag-iwas at pagkontrol ng covid-19 sa mga tao.

now that restorative justice has raised her gaian ecological purpose, to restore multiculturing peace in polyphonic polypathic turquoise eden, how do you continue to justify a win/lose retributive justice evolutionary philosophy of law and moral order as contributing to healthy win/win regeneratively revolutionary democracy? asked the ecosystemic judge of unitingnations jurisdiction. restorative justice was never intended to be effective where either victims or predators are unwilling, often incapable, of re-engaging in cooperative interdependent win/win dialogue, egalitarian discernment in-between trust and mistrust and hostile distrust and restorative retrust. so you argue win/win regenerative assumptions of natural/spiritual creatures are not safely, and not realistically, accessible for all the healing dreams and purposes endemic to our gaian muse of justice? an insufficiency of experience with healthy democratic peace; yes. and, how will continuing to primally rely on win/lose retribution, where victims and a healthy society are presumed to win by punishing criminals and loser scofflaws, lead us toward this noble, and globally multicultural, goal of achieving healthy democratic peace for all earth's regenerative creatures? retributive justice is the state's weapon to protect the common good from further injustice, a deterring threat; not a tool or medicine toward an actively remediating peace, domestic or international, private or public resonant health.
now that restorative justice has raised her gaian ecological purpose, to restore multiculturing peace in polyphonic polypathic turquoise eden, how do you continue to justify a win/lose retributive justice evolutionary philosophy of law and moral order as contributing to healthy win/win regeneratively revolutionary democracy? asked the ecosystemic judge of unitingnations jurisdiction. restorative justice was never intended to be effective where either victims or predators are unwilling, often incapable, of re-engaging in cooperative interdependent win/win dialogue, egalitarian discernment in-between trust and mistrust and hostile distrust and restorative retrust. so you argue win/win regenerative assumptions of natural/spiritual creatures are not safely, and not realistically, accessible for all the healing dreams and purposes endemic to our gaian muse of justice? an insufficiency of experience with healthy democratic peace; yes. and, how will continuing to primally rely on win/lose retribution, where victims and a healthy society are presumed to win by punishing criminals and loser scofflaws, lead us toward this noble, and globally multicultural, goal of achieving healthy democratic peace for all earth's regenerative creatures? retributive justice is the state's weapon to protect the common good from further injustice, a deterring threat; not a tool or medicine toward an actively remediating peace, domestic or international, private or public resonant health.