Вы искали: plaintiff (Английский - Малайский)

plaintiff
plaintif

maksud plaintiff
maksud plaintif

plaintiff's written argument
hujahan bertulis plaintif

plaintiff's statement of claim
hutang dan tertunggak

the father of the second plaintiff
satu siri surat yang ditulis oleh defendan pertama kepada plantif kedua

statement of the plaintiff's claim
penghakiman

breach of duty of care owed to plaintiff
pelanggaran kewajipan penjagaan

particulars of the plaintiff’s goodwill and reputation
defendan menjalankan perniagaan, antara lain, peruncitan bunga

duty of care owed by defendant to the plaintiff according to the proximity
sembang chit

trained healthcare practitioner delivered the plaintiff instead since it will be a difficult delivery
pengamal penjagaan kesihatan terlatih menyampaikan plaintif sebaliknya kerana ia akan menjadi penghantaran yang sukar

i also write a letter regarding about next date of the cases to opposite solicitors and plaintiff/defendant
saya perlu mencatatkan pengurusan kes / pendengaran / pengantaraan kes selepas pembantu undang-undang pulang dari mahkamah.

whether the wording of the word is calculated to result in the plaintiff being hated, ridiculed or insulted in the mind of a reasonable person
adakah perkataan perkataan tersebut adalah diperhitungkan untuk mengakibatkan plaintif dibenci, dipersenda atau dihina dalam minda seorang yang munasabah

suffering from low levels of amniotic fluid and advised her to have her labour induced. the plaintiff agreed and was admitted to the hospital.
hantar tarikh bersalin bayi

an injunction to compel the defendants, its employees, servants and/or agents to restore the plaintiff’s land to its original condition by
perisytiharan bahawa defendan secara tidak sah dan/atau secara salah memasuki atau menyebabkan memasuki tanah plaintif dan memasang atau menyebabkan pemasangan paip pembetung di tanah plaintif atau sebahagiannya secara salah.

9. the defendant subsequently made part of the payment to the plaintiff of rm15,000.00 but there was still an outstanding total balance to the plaintiff of rm184,588.76 which was still owed
9. defendan kemudiannya telah membuat sebahagian pembayaran kepada plaintif sebanyak rm15,000.00 namun masih terdapat jumlah baki yang masih tertunggak kepada plaintif sebanyak rm184,588.76 yang masih terhutang

held: defendant was not liable to pay for the goods. there was no contract between the plaintiff and defendant. plaintiff had no right to accept the offer, which was not addressed to him.
diadakan: defendan tidak bertanggungjawab untuk membayar barangan. tiada kontrak antara plaintif dan defendan. plaintif tidak mempunyai hak untuk menerima tawaraheld: defendant was not liable to pay for the goods. there was no contract between the plaintiff and defendant. plaintiff had no right to accept the offer, which was not addressed to him.ditujukan kepadanya.

the 1st plaintiff had then lodged several police reports in relation to the defendant’s action and his continued unlawful possession of the said lorry. the defendant had unlawfully used and continue to use the said lorry for his personal gain even though the said lorry does not have any road tax and insurance.
tindakan undang-undang translationthe defendan bagi satu deklarasi untuk mengesahkan perjanjian ditamatkan melalui saman pemula penekan no. 24ncvc-264-02/2015 dipukul pada 18-5-2015 oleh mahkamah tinggi. tiada tindakan selanjutnya diambil oleh defendan. meskipun defendan masih enggan untuk membayar atau kembali ke lori tersebut kepada plaintif dalam its 1.

1. if the plaintiff does not have any protection in the interests of the property, the caveat should be included in 2012 and not only in 2016. the defendant argues that this clearly indicates that the plaintiff has knowledge of the will and the plaintiff is not satisfied that the deceased left the will. on behalf of the defendant alone. defendants, therefore, assert that this was a later thought and was made maliciously
1. jikalau plaintiff sememangnya tidak mempunyai sebarang perlindungan bagi kepentingan hartanah tersebut, kaveat seharusnya dimasukkan pada tahun 2012 dan bukannya hanya pada tahun 2016. pihak defendan menegaskan bahawa ini amat jelas membuktikan bahawa plaintif mempunyai pengetahuan tentang wasiat tersebut dan plaintif tidak berpuashati si mati meninggalkan wasiat atas nama defendan seorang sahaja. oleh itu, defendan menegaskan bahawa ini merupakan satu pemikiran kemudian dan dibuat secara mal