You searched for: plaintiffs (Engelska - Maltesiska)

hungary: rights of ngos to stand as plaintiffs in public interest discrimination cases
l-ungerija: drittijiet ta' ngos li jidhru bħala atturi f'każijiet ta' diskriminazzjoni ta' interess pubbliku

paragraph 1 shall not prevent member states from introducing rules of evidence which are more favourable to plaintiffs.
il-paragrafu 1 ma għandux jostakola stati membri milli jintroduċu regoli ta’ evidenza li huma iktar favorevoli għal rikorrenti.

many aspects of the u.s. judicial system make it easy for plaintiffs to bring suit, either individually or as a class.
Ħafna aspetti tas-sistema ġudizzjarja tal-u.s. tagħmilha faċli għall-atturi li jressqu kawżi, jew individwalment jew bħala klassi.

according to legal practitioners, plaintiffs are able to establish the causal link between the defect and damage on the basis of the rules of evidence in the various member states.
skont dawk li jipprattikaw il-liġi, il-kwerelanti huma f'qagħda li jistabbilixxu r-rabta ta' kawżalità bejn id-difett u d-dannu fuq il-bażi tar-regoli ta' prova fl-istati membri differenti.

whereas it is for the member states to introduce, at any appropriate stage of the proceedings, rules of evidence which are more favourable to plaintiffs;
billi huma l-istati membri li għandhom jintroduċu, f'kull stadju approprjat tal-proċeduri, regoli ta' prova li huma aktar favorevoli għall-atturi;

it is currently not possible on the basis of the regulation to group actions, in particular actions of several plaintiffs against the same defendant, before the courts of one member state21.
bħalissa mhuwiex possibbli li abbażi tar-regolament dwar l-azzjonijiet kollettivi ta' diversi atturi kontra l-istess konvenut, quddiem il-qrati ta' wieħed mill-istati membri21.

plaintiff
rikorrent