You searched for: correlation (Engelska - Singalesiska)

borrowed our neighbor's bin to test your theory about physical mess and its correlation to relapse.
ඒවා ගෙනාවේ අපේ අසල්වැසියන්ගේ කුණු බක්කි වලින් ඔයාගේ අර තියරි එක පරික්ෂා කරන්න ඔයා කිහිපු විදිහට ශාරීරික අපහසුතාවයන් ගැන මට නැවතත් මත්ද්‍රව්‍ය ගන්න හිතෙන විදිහට මම දැන් මෙතන ඉදන් ඉන්නේ පැය ගණනක ඉදන්..

i may have done some research into the efficacy of chinese medicine after the herbs that you gave me had a positive correlation with my recovery.
මම පරීක්ෂණ වගයක් කරා ප්‍රථිපල ගැන චීන වෛද්‍ය විද්‍යාව ගැන ඔයා මට අර ඖෂධ පැළෑටි පානය දීල ඒවා මගේ අසනීපයට හොඳ කරන්න බල පැවයින් පස්සේ..

this step is sanctioned by a very weak indifference principle. let us distinguish two cases. the first case, which is the easiest, is where all the minds in question are like your own in the sense that they are exactly qualitatively identical to yours: they have exactly the same information and the same experiences that you have. the second case is where the minds are “like” each other only in the loose sense of being the sort of minds that are typical of human creatures, but they are qualitatively distinct from one another and each has a distinct set of experiences. i maintain that even in the latter case, where the minds are qualitatively different, the simulation argument still works, provided that you have no information that bears on the question of which of the various minds are simulated and which are implemented biologically. a detailed defense of a stronger principle, which implies the above stance for both cases as trivial special instances, has been given in the literature.11 space does not permit a recapitulation of that defense here, but we can bring out one of the underlying intuitions by bringing to our attention to an analogous situation of a more familiar kind. suppose that x% of the population has a certain genetic sequence s within the part of their dna commonly designated as “junk dna”. suppose, further, that there are no manifestations of s (short of what would turn up in a gene assay) and that there are no known correlations between having s and any observable characteristic. then, quite clearly, unless you have had your dna sequenced, it is rational to assign a credence of x% to the hypothesis that you have s. and this is so quite irrespective of the fact that the people who have s have qualitatively different minds and experiences from the people who don’t have s. (they are different simply because all humans have different experiences from one another, not because of any known link between s and what kind of experiences one has.) the same reasoning holds if s is not the property of having a certain genetic sequence but instead the property of being in a simulation, assuming only that we have no information that enables us to predict any differences between the experiences of simulated minds and those of the original biological minds. it should be stressed that the bland indifference principle expressed by (#) prescribes indifference only between hypotheses about which observer you are, when you have no information about which of these observers you are.
සිරස්තලයක් එක් කරන්න