You searched for: pelikulang the healing buod (Engelska - Tagalog)

pelikulang the healing buod
pelikulang the healing buod

aral sa the healing
aral sa pagpapagaling

buod ng pelikulang the maid
miad sama

buod ng pelikulang the mistress
buod ng pelikulang the mistress

thank you lord for the healing
thank you lord for the healing

c/buod ng pelikulang the gifted
c / buod ng pelikulang regalo

buod ng the healing ni vilma santos
buod ng ang pagpapagaling ni vilma santos

tagpuan ng the healing ni vilma santos
tagpuan ng the healing ni vilma santos

now that restorative justice has raised her gaian ecological purpose, to restore multiculturing peace in polyphonic polypathic turquoise eden, how do you continue to justify a win/lose retributive justice evolutionary philosophy of law and moral order as contributing to healthy win/win regeneratively revolutionary democracy? asked the ecosystemic judge of unitingnations jurisdiction. restorative justice was never intended to be effective where either victims or predators are unwilling, often incapable, of re-engaging in cooperative interdependent win/win dialogue, egalitarian discernment in-between trust and mistrust and hostile distrust and restorative retrust. so you argue win/win regenerative assumptions of natural/spiritual creatures are not safely, and not realistically, accessible for all the healing dreams and purposes endemic to our gaian muse of justice? an insufficiency of experience with healthy democratic peace; yes. and, how will continuing to primally rely on win/lose retribution, where victims and a healthy society are presumed to win by punishing criminals and loser scofflaws, lead us toward this noble, and globally multicultural, goal of achieving healthy democratic peace for all earth's regenerative creatures? retributive justice is the state's weapon to protect the common good from further injustice, a deterring threat; not a tool or medicine toward an actively remediating peace, domestic or international, private or public resonant health.
now that restorative justice has raised her gaian ecological purpose, to restore multiculturing peace in polyphonic polypathic turquoise eden, how do you continue to justify a win/lose retributive justice evolutionary philosophy of law and moral order as contributing to healthy win/win regeneratively revolutionary democracy? asked the ecosystemic judge of unitingnations jurisdiction. restorative justice was never intended to be effective where either victims or predators are unwilling, often incapable, of re-engaging in cooperative interdependent win/win dialogue, egalitarian discernment in-between trust and mistrust and hostile distrust and restorative retrust. so you argue win/win regenerative assumptions of natural/spiritual creatures are not safely, and not realistically, accessible for all the healing dreams and purposes endemic to our gaian muse of justice? an insufficiency of experience with healthy democratic peace; yes. and, how will continuing to primally rely on win/lose retribution, where victims and a healthy society are presumed to win by punishing criminals and loser scofflaws, lead us toward this noble, and globally multicultural, goal of achieving healthy democratic peace for all earth's regenerative creatures? retributive justice is the state's weapon to protect the common good from further injustice, a deterring threat; not a tool or medicine toward an actively remediating peace, domestic or international, private or public resonant health.