Şunu aradınız:: population and sampling (İngilizce - Tagalogca)

population and sampling
saklaw at limitasyon

population and sample
populasyon at sample

sample and sampling technique
sample at diskarteng diskarte

population and sampling technique the respondents of this study would be the graduates of ict s.y 2017 2018
teknolohiya ng populasyon at sampling ang mga sumasagot sa pag-aaral na ito ay magiging mga nagtapos ng ict sy 2017 2018

this policy aims to reduce contact rates in the population and thereby reduce transmission of the virus.
ang patakarang ito ay naglalayong bawasan ang dami ng kontak sa populasyon at sa gayon ay mabawasan ang transmisyon ng virus.

many are getting pregnant early, because of this the problem of our population and may be due to human suffering.
marami na ang nabubuntis ng maaga ng dahil sa social media dahil dito pwede itong magkaroon ng problema sa ating bansa at maaring dahilan din ito ng paghihirap ng tao .

a cnn report indicated that the combination of italy's large elderly population and inability to test all who have the virus to date may be contributing to the high fatality rate.
ipinahiwatig ng ulat ng cnn na ang kumbinasyon ng malaking populasyon ng nakatatanda sa italy at ang kawalan ng kakayahang suriin ang lahat na may virus hanggang sa ngayon ay maaaring nag-aambag sa mataas na bilang ng pagkamatay.

by 23 march, no country had tested more than 3% of their population, and there are massive variations in how much testing has been done across countries.
noong marso 23, walang bansa ang nagsuri nang mahigit sa 3% ng kanilang populasyon, at mayroong malawakang pagpababagu-bago kung gaano karaming pagsusuri ang kailangang isagawa sa buong mga bansa.

key to the focus of our study will be the estimation of peak cases in the population and continual monitoring by data collection and modelling the potential growth and emergence of subsequent peaks in new cases as social distancing measures are relaxed.
ang susi sa pokus ng aming pag-aaral ay ang pagtatantya sa mga kaso ng rurok sa populasyon at patuloy na pagsubaybay sa pamamagitan ng pagkolekta ng data at pagmomolde ng potensyal na paglaki at paglitaw ng kasunod na mga rurok sa mga bagong kaso habang ang mga panuntunan sa pagdistansya sa lipunan ay nakaluwag.

a new blog sponsored by the united nations population fund (unfpa) called conversations for a better world has commissioned global voices bloggers to help them highlight online conversations about population and development around the world.
isang bagong panulat na sinuyu ng united nations population fund (unfpa) na tinawag na conversations for a better world ay nagpapatulong sa mga manunulat ng global voices para bigyang-diin ang mga usap-usapan ukol sa populasyon at pagpapaunlad sa buong mundo.

as of 23 march, no country had tested more than 3% of its population, and many countries have had official policies not to test those with only mild symptoms, such as italy, the netherlands, spain, and switzerland.
hanggang noong 23 marso, wala pang bansa ang nakapagsuri ng higit sa 3% ng populasyon nito, at maraming mga bansa ang nagkaroon ng opisyal na mga patakaran na hindi suriin ang mga may banayad na sintomas lamang, tulad ng italy, netherlands, spain, at switzerland.

a) 1/5 = 0.20 b) 1/6 = 0.166 c) 2/11 = 0.1818 d) 11/20 = 0.55 e) 2/9 = 0.222 as you can see, the closest fraction to our result, 0.188, is 2/11, so the right choice for this question is option c). my advice considering how close are options a) and c), it would be too risky taking round figures in this exercise, e.g., 3.5 and 6 million for the population, and 56 100, 20 700 and 28 200 for the gdp per capita. besides, as in the previous exercise, we would not gain much time by doing so. on the other hand, we could also convert every option into percentage format, but note that this is not necessary at al with our original result, 0.188, so it would be a waste of our (always valuable) time. 76
region population gdp per (millions) capita (eur) brussels 1.0 56 104 wallonia 3.4 20 670 flanders 6.1 28 241 (excluding brussels) first, we can calculate the gdp of brussels, which is: 1.0 million persons * 56 104 eur/person = 56 104 million eur note that we have cleared the magnitude 'persons' in both the numerator and the denominator, in the way that we already know. then, we obtain the total gdp of belgium, by adding the gdps of every region: brussels (already calculated): 56 104 million eur wallonia: 3.4 million persons * 20 670 eur/person = 70 278 million eur flanders (excluding brussels): 6.1 million persons * 28 241 eur/person = = 172 270. 1 million eur total gdp: 56 104 + 70 278 + 172 270. 1 = 298 652. 1 million eur so now we can get the share of brussels in this total: 56 104 / 298 652. 1 = 0.188 => 18.8% in percentage format, but we do not even need it for this exercise. which is closest fraction among the available options to answer this question? apart from the first alternative, they are not very easy to calculate mentally, so you can use your calculator to make sure: 75