Results for allegedly translation from Tagalog to English

allegedly mechanical error
mechanical error

allegedly cause of power outage
allegedly cause of power outage

candidates included senator alan cayetano, senator francis escudero, senator gregorio honasan, senator ferdinand "bongbong" marcos, representative lenny robredo, and senator antonio trillanes. cayetano emphasized the need for public service to focus on the needs of the people rather than political elites, referencing the struggles of ordinary citizens. escudero spoke about the importance of equitable service, regardless of political affiliation, and promised to prioritize the interests of the majority. honasan highlighted his extensive experience in the military and politics, pledging to work towards unity and security for the nation. marcos presented his platform with a focus on continuity and progress, while robredo aimed to address the needs of the marginalized and promote inclusive governance. as the debate progressed, candidates responded to questions on pressing national issues, showcasing their platforms and engaging in rebuttals. the atmosphere was charged with the candidates` differing perspectives on governance, corruption, and the future of the philippines, setting the stage for a dynamic exchange of ideas. senator gringo honasan expressed his commitment to building a secure and inclusive future for the nation, emphasizing the importance of investing in the next generation. senator bongbong marcos followed, acknowledging the significance of the upcoming election and addressing various pressing issues such as crime, unemployment, rising prices, and inadequate education. he drew on his extensive experience in both local and national government, advocating for leaders who are dedicated to genuine public service rather than mere political maneuvering. congresswoman lenny robredo articulated her vision of a collaborative vice presidency, stressing that power should not be monopolized but shared. she shared her background as a lawyer for the marginalized, emphasizing her commitment to listening to the voices of the underprivileged and ensuring that governance is inclusive and responsive to their needs. senator antonio trillanes presented his credentials as a soldier and a senator, highlighting his fight against corruption and his dedication to addressing issues of peace and order, particularly the drug problem, which he identified as a major barrier to economic development. senator francis escudero underscored the urgency of tackling corruption, proposing the passage of the freedom of information (foi) bill to enhance transparency in government transactions. escudero also suggested reforms in the bureau of customs to eliminate corrupt practices, advocating for a more transparent and accountable system. the candidates engaged in a robust discussion, each presenting their strategies and visions for a better philippines, reflecting the diverse perspectives and priorities that characterize the electoral landscape. senator honasan emphasized the need to devolve authority and responsibility to local governments, arguing that the focus should not solely be on the national capital region but on empowering local entities to manage essential services such as health, education, and disaster risk reduction. he called for full support from the national government to enable local governments to function effectively and urged for a more active public information system to educate citizens about governance. senator marcos acknowledged the pervasive issue of corruption, asserting that an effective anti-corruption drive must treat all individuals equally, regardless of their political affiliations. he highlighted his own clean record over 27 years of public service and pledged to continue this commitment if elected. congresswoman robredo stressed the importance of integrity among leaders in the anti-corruption movement, advocating for accountability, transparency, and public participation in governance. senator trillanes proposed increasing government salaries to deter corruption and suggested establishing a dedicated anti-corruption agency to investigate anomalies within government agencies, which he argued would enhance accountability. senator cayetano challenged the credibility of his opponents, questioning their commitment to fighting corruption and referencing past scandals involving prominent political figures. in response, senator marcos defended his family's legacy, questioning the basis of the accusations against him and highlighting his long-standing political relationships. the debate continued to intensify as candidates exchanged pointed remarks, each attempting to assert their integrity and commitment to addressing corruption while navigating the complex political landscape. senator cayetano challenged senator marcos regarding the allegations of corruption, questioning the validity of the numbers he presented and highlighting the lack of documentation to support his claims. he pointed out that significant amounts of money were still being contested between the government and the marcos family, emphasizing the need for transparency. senator honasan contributed to the discussion by suggesting that the root of corruption lies in poverty and social injustice, advocating for education and the implementation of a freedom of information (foi) bill to promote transparency in government transactions. senator marcos defended himself against the accusations, referencing an affidavit from janet napoles that allegedly cleared him of any involvement in corruption scandals. he expressed frustration over the politicization of corruption issues, asserting that such tactics hinder genuine public service. congresswoman robredo seized the opportunity to respond, questioning senator escudero's long tenure in congress and his role in maintaining discretionary powers that could lead to corruption. senator escudero, as the finance committee chairman, was prompted to address the concerns raised by robredo, indicating that he had been actively working on reforms to enhance accountability and reduce corruption. the debate continued to be charged with accusations and defenses, as candidates sought to establish their integrity and commitment to fighting corruption while navigating the complexities of their political histories. the atmosphere remained tense as the candidates prepared for a rapid-fire question segment, where they would be required to answer yes or no to direct questions about their involvement in corrupt practices, further intensifying the scrutiny on their records. the debate intensified as senator cayetano referenced the supreme court's decisions regarding the general appropriations act, emphasizing the need for adherence to legal frameworks in addressing corruption. congresswoman robredo pressed senator escudero on his past actions regarding the priority development assistance fund (pdaf), questioning what he had done to prevent discretionary spending during his long tenure in congress. escudero defended his record, stating that he had fought for transparency and accountability, particularly during the arroyo administration when he claimed he had not received any pdaf. senator honasan interjected, arguing that serious issues like corruption should be resolved through proper legal channels rather than political debates. the discussion shifted back to accusations against vice president binay, with senator cayetano asserting that he had evidence of binay's corruption based on testimonies and documents he had reviewed. as the debate continued, a medical student posed a question to senator cayetano about the appropriate penalties for graft and corruption. senator marcos countered, defending his record and suggesting that the accusations against him were politically motivated rather than based on genuine anti-corruption efforts. he expressed his reluctance to participate in what he viewed as politicized hearings, asserting that the focus should be on helping the people rather than engaging in political games. the candidates exchanged barbs regarding their political histories and affiliations, with cayetano sarcastically referencing how some politicians seem to benefit from corruption rather than face consequences. marcos maintained that he distanced himself from what he perceived as politically charged anti-corruption efforts, reiterating his commitment to serving the public without engaging in what he described as political theatrics. the debate showcased the candidates' differing perspectives on corruption, accountability, and the role of politics in addressing these critical issues. the debate took a personal turn as senator marcos questioned the motivations behind the accusations against him, suggesting that they were politically driven rather than based on genuine concerns for governance. senator trillanes responded defensively, asserting that.
no limit tagalog