Results for rights of subrogation translation from Danish to Dutch

retsgrundlag : sections 84 and 85 of the countryside and rights of way act 2000
rechtsgrond : sections 84 and 85 of the countryside and rights of way act 2000

and made use of its rights of pledge and set-off under article 30 .
and made use of its rights of pledge and set-off under article 30 .

and ( b ) made use of its rights of pledge and set-off under article 30 .
and ( b ) made use of its rights of pledge and set-off under article 30 .

sections 83-84, 86-88 and 89-93 of the countryside and rights of way act 2000
sections 83-84, 86-88 and 89-93 of the countryside and rights of way act 2000

(50) furthermore, the uk government explicitly stated that the transfer of the tote into state ownership was not a nationalisation infringing property rights of racing.
(50) furthermore, the uk government explicitly stated that the transfer of the tote into state ownership was not a nationalisation infringing property rights of racing.

retsgrundlag _bar_ parts ii and vi of the national parks and access to the countryside act 1949 and part iv of the countryside and rights of way act 2000 _bar_
rechtsgrond _bar_ parts ii and vi of the national parks and access to the countryside act 1949 and part iv of the countryside and rights of way act 2000 _bar_

nothing in this clause 9 shall limit the right of the ecb to take proceedings before the courts of any other country of competent jurisdiction .
nothing in this clause 9 shall limit the right of the ecb to take proceedings before the courts of any other country of competent jurisdiction .

vicky kloppenburg deltog i et seminar om "rights of the citizens of the european union", som afholdtes af afdelingen for europæiske anliggender under provinsstyret i südtirol åen 7. november 1997 i bolzano, italien.
mevrouw vicky kloppenburg woonde een studiebijeenkomst bij over de "rechten van de burgers van de europese unie", op 7 november 1997 in bolzano, italië, georganiseerd door de afdeling europese zaken van de regering van de autonome provincie südtirol.

det er to århundreder siden, at den store amerikanske revolutionære, tom paine, blev tvunget til at flygte fra england til frankrig, fordi han i 1791 havde vovet at offentliggøre the rights of man (menneskerettighederne).
twee eeuwen geleden moest de grote amerikaanse revolutionair tom paine van engeland naar frankrijk vluchten omdat hij het in 1791 gewaagd had „the rights of man' ' te publiceren.

i hr. de giovannis betænkning tales der om rådgivende udvalg og om, at den lovgivende myndigheds forrang frem for den udøvende myndighed i visse tilfælde begrunder right of recall.
het voorstel beoogt -zoals wij dat toen al geëist hadden - dat, gezien de niet te versmaden ondersteuning, circa 2 miljoen ton jaarcapaciteit stilgelegd moet worden.

49 — jf. navnlig punkt 101, 102 og 138-141 i forslaget til afgørelse. som generaladvokat jacobs har fremhævet, har teorien ligeledes gjort opmærksom på disse vanskeligheder, navnlig j. winter, »the rights of complainants in state aid cases: judicial review of commission decisions adopted under article 88 (ex 93) ec«, common market law review, 1999, nr. 36, s. 521, u. soltész og h. bielesz, »judicial review of state aid decisions«, european competition law review, 2004, s. 133, l. flynn, »remedies in the european courts« i a. biondi m.fl., the law of state aid in the eu, oxford, 2004, s. 283. jf. ligeledes j. azizi, »droits de la défense dans la procédure en matière d’aides d’État: le point de vue judiciaire« i un rôle pour la défense dans les procédures communautaires de concurrence, bruylant, bruxelles, 1997, s. 87, navnlig s. 112-120, g. vandersanden, »pour un élargissement du droit des particuliers d’agir en annulation contre des actes autres que les décisions qui leur sont adressées«, cahiers de droit européen, 1995, nr. 5 og 6, k. lenaerts, »the legal protection of private parties under the ec treaty: a coherent and complete system of judicial review?«, scritti in onore di giuseppe federico mancini, bind ii, diritto dell’unione europea, milano, 1998, b. jankovec og v. kronenberger, »third parties in state aid litigation: locus standi and procedural guarantees« i m. sánchez rydelski, the ec state aid regime: distortive effects of state aid on competition and trade, may, london, 2006, s. 848, a. sinnaeve, »state aid procedures: developments since the entry into force of the procedural regulation«, common market law review 2007, nr. 44, s. 965, og e. coulon og s. cras, »contentieux de la légalité dans le domaine des aides d’État: les récentes évolutions dans l’application des articles 173 et 175 du traité ce«, cahiers de droit européen, 1999, bind 35, nr. 1 og 2, s. 61, navnlig s. 91-110.
49 — zie met name punten 101, 102, en 138-141 van die conclusie. zoals advocaatgeneraal jacobs onderstreept, zijn deze problemen ook besproken in de literatuur, met name winter, j., „the rights of complainants in state aid cases: judicial review of commission decisions adopted under article 88 (ex 93) ec”, common market law review, 1999, nr. 36, blz. 521; soltész, u., en bielesz, h., „judicial review of state aid decisions”, european competition law review, 2004, blz. 133; flynn, l., „remedies in the european courts”, in a. biondi e.a. (ed.), the law of state aid in the eu, oxford, 2004, blz. 283. zie ook azizi, j., „droits de la défense dans la procédure en matière d’aides d’État: le point de vue judiciaire”, in un rôle pour la défense dans les procédures communautaires de concurrence, bruylant, brussel, 1997, blz.