Trying to learn how to translate from the human translation examples.
From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
altmark 1 –
altmarki esimene kriteerium –
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
altmark criteria
altmarki kohtuasja kriteeriumid
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
altmark criterion 4
neljas altmarki kriteerium
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
fourth altmark criterion
neljas altmarki kriteerium
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 3
Quality:
the other altmark criteria
altmarki kohtuotsuse teised kriteeriumid
Last Update: 2014-11-08
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
altmark judgment, paragraph 84.
osutatud altmarki kohtuotsus, punkt 84.
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
altmark judgment, paragraph 78.
altmarki kohtuotsus, punkt 78.
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 3
Quality:
the altmark criteria are not met.
altmarki kohtuotsuses sätestatud kriteeriumid on täitmata.
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
judgment in altmark, paragraph 107.
vt altmarki otsus, punkt 107.
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
altmark see paragraphs 101 to 109.
op. cit. altmark, punktid 101–109.
Last Update: 2014-11-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
fulfilment of the four altmark criteria
altmarki kohtuasja neljast kriteeriumist kinnipidamine
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
altmark judgment, paragraph 88 et seq.
osutatud kohtuotsus, punkt 88 jj.
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
the criteria in the judgment in altmark
kohtuotsuse altmark kriteeriumid
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
no overcompensation (third altmark criterion)
ÜlemÄÄrase hÜvitamise puudumine (kolmas altmarki kriteerium)
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
paragraphs 77 and 82 of the altmark judgment.
kohtuasjas altmark tehtud otsuse punktid 77 ja 82.
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
the conditions of the altmark judgment are not met
kohtuotsuses altmark määratletud tingimused ei ole täidetud
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
the fourth altmark criterion is therefore not met.
seega ei ole neljas altmarki kriteerium täidetud.
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
thus, the second altmark criterion is not fulfilled.
teine altmarki kriteerium ei ole seega täidetud.
Last Update: 2014-11-13
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
case c-280/00, altmark, cited above.
kohtuasi c-280/00, altmark, osutatud eespool.
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
applicability of the altmark case-law to the present case
märkused altmarki kohtupraktika kohaldatavuse kohta käesoleval juhul
Last Update: 2014-11-21
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality: