From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
(1) microsoft azure
(1) microsoft azure
Last Update: 2018-02-13
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
el coste total para instalaciones de nivel 1 – microsoft en $ 2,6 millones.
total cost for tier 1 installations – microsoft at $2.6 million.
Last Update: 2018-02-13
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
admiral byng, to w. brough, esq., marshal … before his death,” 1757.
admiral byng, to w. brough, esq., marshal … before his death,” 1757.
Last Update: 2016-03-03
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
todos los contenidos del sitio web xbox.com son: copyright © 2010 microsoft corporation y/o sus proveedores, one microsoft way, redmond, washington 98052 u.s.a.
all contents of the xbox.com web site are: copyright © 2010 microsoft corporation and/or its suppliers, one microsoft way, redmond, washington 98052 u.s.a.
Last Update: 2011-03-28
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
0ara ser elcaz la el e c c i � n de ley i debe r � ser expresa o resultar de manera cierta de los t � r mi nos del contrato o de las circunstancias del caso w segunda frase del apartado del ar t � c u lo !l menos tal es la v e r si� n f r a nc esa del#onvenio l el m en t e reproducida por la v e r si� n es p a � o la i de manera cier t a w pero que la m en t a b le mente di o lugar a t r ad u c ciones divergen t es � a � n menos v i ncu l antes � en otras lenguas i w i t h a re a son a b le c e r t a in t y w enla v e r si� n in g l esa imithinreichender3icherheitw en la v e r si� n al e ma n a iin modo r a g i o n e vo l mente c e r to w enla v e r si� n i tal i an a %stas v ar i a ciones re su l tan des dicha d a sfi dado que por ese preciso m o ti vo exis t e un riesgo de des p la zamientodelumbralquepermitepasardelanormadeconmicto sustentado en la auto no m � a de la vo l un t ad ala norma de lo c al i z a c i � n o b j e ti v a del contrato se g � n se op t e por los tribunales de uno o de otro%stado contra t ante %lpuntosobreelqueyasehanpuestodemanilesto divergencias notables es el del alcance que debe recono c e r se auna c l � u su la a t r ib u ti v a de competencia a los tribunales de un%stado determina do sin estar a c o mp a � ad a de una c l � u su la de el e c c i � n de la ley de dicho %stado ,os textos in g l � sfi y al e m � n permiten interpreta r en este caso una el e c c i � n t � c i t a de la ley de dicho %stado c o sa queno admite el texto f r a nc � s
4he (ague#onvention concerning the s al e of g o o dfis at p re s ent b in dfis a m o n g s t o t h e r s l v e 3tates that are also party to the 2ome #onvention $ e n m a r k & in l and & r ance )taly and 3weden 7 h i l e t h e o re t i c al l y where theparties have not chosen the lawof the contract the (ague#onvention u s e s the lawof the s e l l e r s place of habitual residence and is therefore in that respect inharmonywiththecharacteristicservicesystemsetupbythe2ome#on vention it di v e r g e s from it on v a r i o u s po in t s # o n s i d e r ing only themost important it includes no general e x c ep tion c l a use providing only for thecaseof very f re q u ent application of the bu y e r s law which does not necessarily correspond to the e x c ep tion c l a use in the 2ome #onvention ! bo v e all h o w e v e r the(ague#onventionappliestosalestoconsumersanditmaybesupposed thatinmattersofsalesitrendersinapplicabletheconmictruleprotectingthe con s u m e r laiddownin !rticle ofthe 2ome #onvention /necanonlyregretthatinthecaseofacontractasfundamentalasacontract ofsalethe-ember3tatesofthe%uropean%conomic#ommunityshouldnot have been able to a g re e on a uniform conmict rule some applying the (ague#onvention and o t h e r s the 2ome #onvention )t would be de s i r able for those 3tates to a d op t a common position v i s � v is the (ague#onvention either d e n o u n c ing it as " e lg i u m di d re c e n t l y supporting it or even all r a t if y ing the m o re re c ent (ague#onvention of $ e c em ber which is intended to re place that of but has not y e t entered into for c e ! basic solu tion would beforthe3tatespartytothe(ague#onventiontomakethedeclarationpro videdforinthe & inal!ctofthe8)6thsessionofthe(ague#onferencein to the effect that @ the #onvention of *u n e on the , a w applicable to)nternational3alesof'oodsdoesnotprevent3tates0artiesfromapplying special ruleson the law applicable to con s u m e r s al e s ! l l d o u bt would t h e re by be r em o v e d re g a r d ing the uniform application of !rticle ofthe 2ome #onvention inall the contracting 3 t a t e s
Last Update: 2014-02-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting