From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
véanse gutter v. bollinger, 539 u.s. 309 (2003) y united states v. virginia, 518 u.s. 515 (1996).
see gutter v. bollinger, 539 u.s. 309 (2003); united states v. virginia, 518 u.s. 515, 531 (1996).
Last Update: 2016-11-30
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
además, el tribunal ha recibido una nueva causa: la causa m/v "virginia g " (panamá/guinea-bissau).
in addition, the tribunal has received a new case: the m/v "virginia g " case (panama/guinea-bissau).
Last Update: 2016-11-29
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting
62. sin embargo, en el caso united states v. virginia (518 u.s. 515 (1996)), el tribunal supremo estableció la expresión actual del principio de igualdad en presencia de distinciones por género, al estimar que éstos debían estar justificados de una manera "sumamente comunicante " (ídem, 533).
62. however, in united states v. virginia, 518 u.s. 515 (1996), the supreme court articulated the current standard for equal protection review of gender distinctions. the justification for such distinctions must be "exceedingly persuasive. " id. at 533.
Last Update: 2016-11-30
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
Warning: Contains invisible HTML formatting
Some human translations with low relevance have been hidden.
Show low-relevance results.
