Results for what means no mattet whaz translation from Spanish to English

que sapingo, means no talent
sapingo

véase manual means no 1:17 y siguientes.
see means handbook no. 1: 17 ff.

- what means nothing to you, means everything to me.
- what means nothing to you, means everything to me.

no leads means no sales and no sales means no money. it is as simple as that.
no leads means no sales and no sales means no money. it is as simple as that.

todas las disposiciones necesarias siempre podrán ser incluidas en los tratados de adhesión, así que vaya nuestro cordial saludo para irlanda: no means no!
all the necessary regulations can be recorded in the accession treaty and to ireland we send our friendly greetings: no means no!

todas las disposiciones necesarias siempre podrán ser incluidas en los tratados de adhesión, así que vaya nuestro cordial saludo para irlanda: no means no! (¡no, quiere decir no!)
all the necessary regulations can be recorded in the accession treaty and to ireland we send our friendly greetings: no means no!

"in mid-october falleni lodged an appeal against the conviction, the basis of which was:"...that the jury's verdict was against evidence, that the evidence tendered by the crown was weak and merely circumstantial; that the case against the accused set up by the crown was destroyed by the evidence of the crown's medical witnesses; that the identification of the appellant with some person alleged by the crown to have been seen in the neighbourhood of the place where a charred body was found was unsatisfactory, and that owing to nervous prostration at the trial, the appellant was physically unable to make a statement of facts, which would have answered the circumstantial evidence..."the court of criminal appeal dismissed the case finding that if the original jury 'came to the conclusion that the accused was the person who had brought about the death of the woman, no matter by what means, it was justified in finding a verdict of guilty'.
"in mid-october falleni lodged an appeal against the conviction, the basis of which was:"...that the jury's verdict was against evidence, that the evidence tendered by the crown was weak and merely circumstantial; that the case against the accused set up by the crown was destroyed by the evidence of the crown's medical witnesses; that the identification of the appellant with some person alleged by the crown to have been seen in the neighbourhood of the place where a charred body was found was unsatisfactory, and that owing to nervous prostration at the trial, the appellant was physically unable to make a statement of facts, which would have answered the circumstantial evidence..."the court of criminal appeal dismissed the case finding that if the original jury 'came to the conclusion that the accused was the person who had brought about the death of the woman, no matter by what means, it was justified in finding a verdict of guilty'.