Vous avez cherché: limb (Italien - Anglais)

limb c. 2006.
limb c. 2006.

going out on a limb, isn't he.
going out on a limb, isn't he.

"work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders", relazione
“work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders” report

le strette collaborazioni con jirí kylián e paul lightfoot hanno dato poi alla compagnia un tocco moderno e il cinquantesimo anniversario è stato celebrato con limb s theorem di william forsythe.
close associations with jirí kylián and paul lightfoot have given the company a modern touch and the 50th anniversary in the autumn of 1958 was celebrated with the william forsythe’s limbs theorem.

abstract. lum ps, burgar cg, shor pc, majmundar m, van der loos m. robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. arch phys med rehabil 2002;83:952-9. objective: to compare the effects of robot-assisted movement training with conventional techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. design: randomized controlled trial, 6-month follow-up. setting: a department of veterans affairs rehabilitation research and development center. participants: consecutive sample of 27 subjects with chronic hemiparesis (
6mo after cerebrovascular accident) randomly allocated to group. interventions: all subjects received twenty-four 1-hour sessions over 2 months. subjects in the robot grouppracticed shoulder and elbow movements while assisted by a robot manipulator. subjects in the control group received neurodevelopmental therapy (targeting proximal upper limb function) and 5 minutes of exposure to the robot in each session. main outcome measures: fugl-meyer assessment of motor impairment, fim™ instrument, and biomechanic measures of strength and reaching kinematics. clinical evaluations were performed by a therapist blinded to group assignments. results: compared with the control group, the robot group had larger improvements in the proximal movement portion of the fugl-meyer test after 1 month of treatment (p.05) and also after 2 months of treatment (p.05). the robot grouphad larger gains in strength (p.02) and larger increases in reach extent (p.01) after 2 months of treatment. at the 6-month follow-up, the groups no longer differed in terms of the fuglmeyer test (p
.30); however, the robot grouphad larger improvements in the fim (p.04). conclusions:compared with conventional treatment, robotassisted movements had advantages in terms of clinical and biomechanical measures. further research into the use of robotic manipulation for motor rehabilitation is justified.
academic publishing