Hai cercato la traduzione di incite da Inglese a Malese

instigate ; incite, prompt
menghasut

and when they see a sign they incite one another to scoff,
dan apabila mereka melihat sesuatu tanda (yang membuktikan kekuasaan kami dan kebenaranmu), mereka mencari-cari jalan memperolok-olokkannya, -

do you not realize that we have sent satan to incite the unbelievers to sin.
tidakkah engkau mengetahui (wahai muhammad) bahawa kami telah menghantarkan syaitan-syaitan kepada orang-orang kafir, untuk menggalakkan mereka mengerjakan perbuatan kufur dan maksiat dengan bersungguh-sungguh?

they shall pass on to one another a cup that will incite neither levity nor sin.
mereka di dalam syurga itu (kerana melahirkan kemesraan antara satu dengan yang lain): berebut-rebut mengambil piala yang berisi arak yang tidak menyebabkan timbul (dari peminumnya) perkara yang sia-sia dan tidak pula menyebabkan (peminumnya menanggung) dosa.

do you not see that we have appointed devils to incite those who deny the truth to disobedience?
tidakkah engkau mengetahui (wahai muhammad) bahawa kami telah menghantarkan syaitan-syaitan kepada orang-orang kafir, untuk menggalakkan mereka mengerjakan perbuatan kufur dan maksiat dengan bersungguh-sungguh?

do you not see that we have sent devils upon the unbelievers who greatly incite them (to oppose the truth)?
tidakkah engkau mengetahui (wahai muhammad) bahawa kami telah menghantarkan syaitan-syaitan kepada orang-orang kafir, untuk menggalakkan mereka mengerjakan perbuatan kufur dan maksiat dengan bersungguh-sungguh?

o believers, do not follow in satan's footsteps, for he will incite to indecency and wickedness any who will follow him.
wahai orang-orang yang beriman, janganlah kamu menurut jejak langkah syaitan; dan sesiapa yang menurut jejak langkah syaitan, maka sesungguhnya syaitan itu sentiasa menyuruh (pengikut-pengikutnya) melakukan perkara yang keji dan perbuatan yang mungkar.

when you have left the pilgrim sanctity, you may hunt. and let not the hatred of people who barred you from the sacred mosque incite you to aggression.
dan hendaklah kamu bertolong-tolongan untuk membuat kebajikan dan bertaqwa, dan janganlah kamu bertolong-tolongan pada melakukan dosa (maksiat) dan pencerobohan.

his companion said: “i did not incite him to rebel; he was far gone into error of his own accord.”
(semasa ia dihumbankan ke dalam neraka jahannam, ia mendakwa bahawa syaitanlah yang menjadikan dia sesat; pada saat itu) syaitan yang sentiasa menyertainya (di dunia dahulu) berkata: "wahai tuhan kami, aku tidak menyesatkannya tetapi sememangnya dia sendiri berada di dalam kesesatan yang jauh terpesong".

and when ye have put off the state of sanctity, ye may chase. and let not the hatred against a people, because they kept you from the sacred mosque, incite you to trespass.
dan hendaklah kamu bertolong-tolongan untuk membuat kebajikan dan bertaqwa, dan janganlah kamu bertolong-tolongan pada melakukan dosa (maksiat) dan pencerobohan.

and incite [to senselessness] whoever you can among them with your voice and assault them with your horses and foot soldiers and become a partner in their wealth and their children and promise them."
dan desak serta pujuklah sesiapa yang engkau dapat memujuknya dengan suaramu; dan kerahlah penyokong-penyokongmu yang berkuda serta yang berjalan kaki untuk mengalahkan mereka; dan turut - campurlah dengan mereka dalam menguruskan harta-benda dan anak-anak (mereka); dan janjikanlah mereka (dengan janji-janjimu)".

critical debate on contents of books- the author of this book writes and makes it clear the challenges of relativity against religion with a sharper focus on christianity. the strength of this writing lies in its analytical capacity and a wide variety of referencing in academic terms to support the argued points. however, this writing needs to be critically analyzed in a few areas. the writer has included different perspectives from figures like joseph ratzinger, john hick, and many other academicians. it offers a complete overview of how such forms of relativism challenge the concepts that have traditionally been considered in terms of the truth of religions. it had a deep analysis on relativism as the main challenge to traditional religion in general with its focus on christianity and was backed up by relevant examples, some from contemporary times and some more from history. like the author discusses how religious pluralism challenges the christian belief that it alone is true. there is, however, a demerit in it from the point of a major case of disproportion in the approach of argumentation. the author has a tendency to approach relativism and by completely weighing his judgment in favor of , such it is the threat to traditional religion. in that part of the book, he has not set a sufficient room to look at the positive side relativism. relativism can also be an approach to incite intercultural and interreligious discussions, it can provide a constructive role in promoting tolerance and mutual understanding. again, this remarkable potential is virtually ignored in this book. for instance, views on ratzinger concerning relativism, wherein he sees relativism as a new dictator pressing religious freedom, are often framed in a very exaggerated manner without leaving room for the possibility that relativism can be employed to counter the ideologies of religion which are the ones usually causing such conflict. in addition, the study of this book has been mainly focused on the threats propagated by the diversities of culture and religion to the stability of traditional values. however, there has not been much of an exploration and discussion regarding how this diversity can make way for revision in religious interpretation. in the age of globalization, it is undeniable that diversity as far as cultures and religions has the potential to threaten the practice of traditions, but it also brings the possibility for a religion to stand actualized in an ever-advancing world. the author is deficient here since he did not emphasize this sort of inclusive approach, which allows traditional religions to co-exist with other diverse paradigms of world views. next, although the author has successfully demonstrated how relativism can undermine the moral authority of religions through denial of the concept of absolute truth, he does not offer a clear middle ground between absolutism and relativism. the discussion of relativism is often characterized as defensive, as though there were no room for compromise. for example, issues regarding human rights and individual freedom are often related to relativism but have not been dealt with in much detail. the author seems to have a bias toward absolutism in religion, which may be less applicable in today’s highly pluralistic society. moreover, the author does not emphasize how epistemological change would cause from relativism to revivalism in more inclusive modes towards contemporary contexts. for instance, such concepts as "local truth", as proposed by john hick, would have the potentialof enriching religious experience by acknowledging the different human approaches to making sense of the reality of divinity. unfortunately, the current book regards that only in a threatening light without accounting for the constructive aspects of promoting inter-religious debate. to sum it up, the author of this book has put in place a resounding argument as to how relativism threatens religious tradition. however, the viewpoint given by the author is very confined. the observation by the author on the phenomenon of relativism and the challenges that come to religion form the strength of this book. yet, it still brings some weaknesses, where the evaluation of relativism has shown unbalance because it is not seen as an opportunity but only brings risk to religion. the author has to be equal and inclusive enough to widen the discussion that would make the book more effective. last but not least, the author should consider relativism as a ground to create dialogue between religions and cultures in a world that gets increasingly complicated.
debat kritikal mengenai kandungan buku penulis buku ini menulis dan menjelaskan cabaran relativiti terhadap agama dengan tumpuan yang lebih tajam terhadap agama kristian. kekuatan penulisan ini terletak pada keupayaan analisisnya dan pelbagai rujukan dari segi akademik untuk menyokong hujah-hujah yang dikemukakan. walau bagaimanapun, penulisan ini perlu dianalisis secara kritis dalam beberapa bidang. penulis telah memasukkan perspektif yang berbeza daripada tokoh-tokoh seperti joseph ratzinger, john hick, dan banyak lagi