Hai cercato la traduzione di force one (mumbai police) da Spagnolo a Inglese

how air force one works.
"how air force one works.

se va a hacer en el air force one
it will do in the air force one

» air force one charm offensive takes off (politico)
» air force one charm offensive takes off (politico)

* dorr, robert f. "air force one".
* dorr, robert f. "air force one".

q&a: u.s. presidential jet air force one.
* braun, david "q&a: u.s. presidential jet air force one.

"flying white house: the story of air force one".
"flying white house: the story of air force one".

"air force one: the aircraft that shaped the modern presidency".
"air force one: the aircraft that shaped the modern presidency".

la flota de transporte vip ocasionalmente operó como air force one durante los setenta y los ochenta.
the vip transport fleet occasionally served as air force one during the 1970s and 1980s.

air force one es atacado en el aire sólo para ser salvado por el amazonas princesa, wonder woman (diana prince) y superman.
air force one is attacked in the air, but is saved by the amazon princess wonder woman (diana prince) and superman.

el pabellón del "air force one" se abrió al público el 24 de octubre de 2005.
the library's air force one pavilion was opened to the public on 24 october 2005.

air force one puede significar:*air force one, aeronave oficial del presidente de los estados unidos.
air force one is the call sign for any u.s. air force aircraft carrying the president of the united states.

el boeing 707 que sirvió como "air force one" durante los años 1980 (sam 27000) está en exhibición en la biblioteca presidencial de ronald reagan.
the boeing 707 that served as air force one from the nixon years through the george h. w. bush administration (sam 27000) is on display in simi valley, california at the ronald reagan presidential library.

johnson esperó a jacqueline kennedy a bordo del air force one, que a su vez no aseguró que no dejaría dallas sin el cuerpo de su marido.
the president waited for jacqueline kennedy, who in turn would not leave dallas without her husband's body, to arrive aboard air force one.

"* walsh, kenneth t. "air force one: a history of the presidents and their planes".
"* walsh, kenneth t. "air force one: a history of the presidents and their planes".

en el avion presidencial air force one que va a retrasar una hora su salida de suecia, para ayudar a permitir la celebracion de ese historica reunion y encuentro politico del presidente barack obama y el 666.
in the presidential plane air force one is going to lose an hour his departure from sweden, to help allow celebration of that historic meeting and political meeting of president barack obama and 666.

en noviembre de 2011, la agencia associated press reportó que la copia personal de las grabaciones del air force one perteneciente al general chester clifton estaba en venta, a un precio inicial de 500,000 dólares (ap, 15 de noviembre de 2011, fuente).
in november 2011 ap reported that gen. chester clifton’s personal copy of the air force one recordings was being put up for sale, with an asking price of $500,000 (ap, november 15, 2011, link).

el afirmó que intentaba usar el misil contra el air force one, el avión presidencial de estados unidos, o un avión comercial norteamericano, y se entendió que intentaba comprar 50 más de estos misiles.
he is said to have intended the missile to be used in an attack on air force one, the american presidential plane, or on a commercial us airliner, and is understood to have planned to buy 50 more of these weapons.

sessions and russia tessa berenson updated: mar 03, 2017 7:24 am hora | originally published: mar 02, 2017 attorney general jeff sessions found himself in middle of a political firestorm this week when the washington post reported that he had met twice with the russian ambassador to the u.s. during the presidential campaign, despite seeming to deny this during his confirmation hearing. lawmakers on both sides immediately jumped on sessions and called for him to recuse himself from russia investigations or resign. sessions announced thursday afternoon that he would recuse himself from investigations into president donald trump's campaign, but maintained he did not lie in his hearing and did nothing wrong in meeting with the russian ambassador. trump defended his attorney general on thursday evening, accusing democrats of waging a "total witch hunt." here are the answers to six questions about the controversy. what did the washington post report? in an article published wednesday night entitled "sessions met with russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose," the post wrote that then-senator sessions met twice with the russian ambassador to the u.s. sergey kislyak in 2016. the paper said sessions met with kislyak once in july and once in september. what exactly did sessions say in his confirmation hearing? democratic sen. al franken of minnesota asked sessions, "cnn just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week... these documents also allegedly say quote, 'there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government.'... if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the trump campaign communicated with the russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?" sessions replied, "senator franken, i'm not aware of any of those activities. i have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and i didn't have — did not have communications with the russians, and i'm unable to comment on it." what does sessions say now? "i never met with any russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign," sessions said in a statement after the post story came out. "i have no idea what this allegation is about. it is false.” sessions further elaborated thursday afternoon when he announced he would recuse himself. "let me be clear. i never had meetings with russian operatives or russian intermediaries about the trump campaign," he said. "and the idea that i was part of a quote, 'continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government' is totally false. that is the question that senator franken asked me at the hearing. i did not respond referring to the two meetings... where no such things were discussed. my reply to the question of senator franken was honest and correct as i understood it at the time." how did everyone react? democrats and republicans in congress reacted swiftly. many in both parties called on sessions to recuse himself from any investigations into russian interference in the election. others, including the top democrats in both the house and senate, have called on him to resign. president trump said he had "total" confidence in sessions, who he said "probably" told the truth in his testimony. the white house defended sessions. press secretary sean spicer briefly addressed the controversy thursday aboard air force one, telling reporters, “there’s no there there.” "he was clearly asked about his role as a campaign surrogate," spicer said, explaining session's answer in congressional testimony. “he was literally conducting himself as a u.s. senator. he didn’t do anything that wasn’t part of his job." why does this all matter? it matters because while sessions was a member of the senate's armed services committee, he was also one of president trump's top foreign policy advisors during his campaign. and trump's inner circle has for months been dogged by accusations of improper contact with russia, at the same time that russia has been accused of using cyber-attacks to meddle in the u.s. election. during his campaign, trump often praised russian president vladimir putin's leadership, and once the u.s. intelligence community concluded that russia was behind hacks on the democratic national committee, trump was reluctant to publicly accept the findings. last august, trump's campaign chairman paul manafort resigned over questions about his links to ukraine's former pro-russia regime. then just last month, trump's national security adviser michael flynn was forced to resign after it came to light that he had misled vice president mike pence about his contact with russia during the transition. in other words, this matters particularly because this is not the first instance of questionable contact between members of the trump administration and russia. what's next? republicans were largely satisfied with sessions' decision to recuse himself, and trump has stood by him. but some leading democrats are continuing to call for his resignation ingles. español
tradukka ewhat to know about jeff sessions and russia tessa berenson updated: mar 03, 2017 7:24 am hora | originally published: mar 02, 2017 attorney general jeff sessions found himself in middle of a political firestorm this week when the washington post reported that he had met twice with the russian ambassador to the u.s. during the presidential campaign, despite seeming to deny this during his confirmation hearing. lawmakers on both sides immediately jumped on sessions and called for him to recuse himself from russia investigations or resign. sessions announced thursday afternoon that he would recuse himself from investigations into president donald trump's campaign, but maintained he did not lie in his hearing and did nothing wrong in meeting with the russian ambassador. trump defended his attorney general on thursday evening, accusing democrats of waging a "total witch hunt." here are the answers to six questions about the controversy. what did the washington post report? in an article published wednesday night entitled "sessions met with russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose," the post wrote that then-senator sessions met twice with the russian ambassador to the u.s. sergey kislyak in 2016. the paper said sessions met with kislyak once in july and once in september. what exactly did sessions say in his confirmation hearing? democratic sen. al franken of minnesota asked sessions, "cnn just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week... these documents also allegedly say quote, 'there was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government.'... if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the trump campaign communicated with the russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?" sessions replied, "senator franken, i'm not aware of any of those activities. i have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and i didn't have — did not have communications with the russians, and i'm unable to comment on it." what does sessions say now? "i never met with any russian officials to discuss issues of the campaign," sessions said in a statement after the post story came out. "i have no idea what this allegation is about. it is false.” sessions further elaborated thursday afternoon when he announced he would recuse himself. "let me be clear. i never had meetings with russian operatives or russian intermediaries about the trump campaign," he said. "and the idea that i was part of a quote, 'continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government' is totally false. that is the question that senator franken asked me at the hearing. i did not respond referring to the two meetings... where no such things were discussed. my reply to the question of senator franken was honest and correct as i understood it at the time." how did everyone react? democrats and republicans in congress reacted swiftly. many in both parties called on sessions to recuse himself from any investigations into russian interference in the election. others, including the top democrats in both the house and senate, have called on him to resign. president trump said he had "total" confidence in sessions, who he said "probably" told the truth in his testimony. the white house defended sessions. press secretary sean spicer briefly addressed the controversy thursday aboard air force one, telling reporters, “there’s no there there.” "he was clearly asked about his role as a campaign surrogate," spicer said, explaining session's answer in congressional testimony. “he was literally conducting himself as a u.s. senator. he didn’t do anything that wasn’t part of his job." why does this all matter? it matters because while sessions was a member of the senate's armed services committee, he was also one of president trump's top foreign policy advisors during his campaign. and trump's inner circle has for months been dogged by accusations of improper contact with russia, at the same time that russia has been accused of using cyber-attacks to meddle in the u.s. election. during his campaign, trump often praised russian president vladimir putin's leadership, and once the u.s. intelligence community concluded that russia was behind hacks on the democratic national committee, trump was reluctant to publicly accept the findings. last august, trump's campaign chairman paul manafort resigned over questions about his links to ukraine's former pro-russia regime. then just last month, trump's national security adviser michael flynn was forced to resign after it came to light that he had misled vice president mike pence about his contact with russia during the transition. in other words, this matters particularly because this is not the first instance of questionable contact between members of the trump administration and russia. what's next? republicans were largely satisfied with sessions' decision to recuse himself, and trump has stood by him. but some leading democrats are continuing to call for his resignation spañol ingles