전문 번역가, 번역 회사, 웹 페이지 및 자유롭게 사용할 수 있는 번역 저장소 등을 활용합니다.
dit is geen steekhoudend argument.
this argument is not convincing.
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-05
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
geen van deze argumenten is steekhoudend.
none of these arguments holds water.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 2
품질:
het argument is echter niet steekhoudend.
nonetheless, this is an argument that does not hold water.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 3
품질:
ik denk dat jouw theorie niet steekhoudend is.
i think your theory does not hold water.
마지막 업데이트: 2014-02-01
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
mijns inziens is dit absoluut niet steekhoudend.
i would say they are completely unfounded.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 3
품질:
zuiver economisch bekeken zijn deze argumenten steekhoudend.
this argument is probably right from a purely economic point of view.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 3
품질:
deze regelgeving is in mijn ogen in alle opzichten steekhoudend.
in my view, this legislation is valid from all viewpoints.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 3
품질:
dit alles is weliswaar steekhoudend, maar alleen in theorie.
this is all very well in theory.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 3
품질:
de geschriften van de profeten (de bijbel) zijn zeer steekhoudend.
the scriptures of the prophets (the bible) makes perfect sense.
마지막 업데이트: 2018-02-13
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
het argument van de exporteurs is derhalve niet steekhoudend en moet worden afgewezen.
the claim made by the exporters is therefore not valid and must be rejected.
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-18
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
ik wil u bedanken voor uw bijdragen, die allemaal zeer nuttig en steekhoudend waren.
we will have the opportunity to do so on other occasions.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 3
품질:
zij hebben één steekhoudend argument, namelijk dat het voorgestelde systeem tot bedrog kan leiden.
they have one valid argument, namely that the proposed system could lead to deceit.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 3
품질:
aangezien dit argument steekhoudend was, is de dumpingmarge van de producent/exporteur dienovereenkomstig gecorrigeerd.
this claim could be accepted, and the dumping margin of the exporting producer was adjusted accordingly.
마지막 업데이트: 2014-11-21
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
om deze redenen lijkt par. 3.2.3.3 niet steekhoudend en zou deze moeten worden geschrapt.
for these reasons, there is no basis for point 3.2.3.3 and it should be deleted.
마지막 업데이트: 2017-04-06
사용 빈도: 1
품질:
dat lijkt mij een steekhoudende vraag.
this is an issue which i believe is relevant.
마지막 업데이트: 2012-02-29
사용 빈도: 3
품질: