Van professionele vertalers, bedrijven, webpagina's en gratis beschikbare vertaalbronnen.
Østre landsret, Κ ν specialarbejderforbundet, 8. september 1989, danmark.
sexual harassment reflects general attitudes which perpetuate the view of women as sexual objects rather than equal members of the workforce.
tilbagebetalingskravene blev afslået, og selskaberne anlagde sag mod industriministeriet ved Østre landsret.
since their requests for a refund were rejected, the companies in question commenced proceedings in the Østre landsret against the ministry of industry.
Østre landsret bekræftede konkurrencerådets afgørelse om aktindsigt i virksomhedens rabat- og bonusaftaler.
the 0stre landsret confirmed the competition board's decision on the publicnature of the discount and rebate agreements concluded by the company.
Østre landsret har herefter besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge domstolen to præjudicielle spørgsmål.
in those circumstances the Østre landsret decided to stay proceedings and to refer two questions to the court for a preliminary ruling.
Østre landsret har herefter besluttet at udsætte sagen og forelægge domstolen følgende fem præjudicielle spørgsmål:
it was in those circumstances that the Østre landsret decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following five questions to the court for a preliminary ruling:
Østre landsret har fastslået, at metro er omfattet af prismærkningsloven. metro har indbragt landsrettens afgørelse for højesteret.
the eastern high court ruled that metro is indeed covered by the price labelling act.metro has referred the high courfls ruling to the supreme court.
dat-schaub anlagde herefter sag mod ministeriet ved Østre landsret med påstand om tilbagebetaling af 9 898 936,75 dkk.
facts and relevant legal provisions an action against the ministry before the Østre landsret, claiming reimbursement of dkk 9 898 936.75.
ved kendelse af 26. september 2001 har Østre landsret forelagt to præjudicielle spørgsmål vedrørende fortolkningen af artikel 28 ef og 30 ef.
by order of 26 september 2001 the Østre landsret (eastern regional court) referred to the court for a preliminary ruling two questions on the interpretation of articles 28 ec and 30 ec.
denne afgørelse blev ophævet af konkurrenceankenævntet den 1. november 2006, men efter appel stadfæstet af Østre landsret den 22. juni 2009.
this decision was quashed by the competition appeals tribunal on 1 november 2006 but then upheld on appeal to the eastern high court on 22 june 2009.
anhydro kærede denne kendelse til Østre landsret samtidig med, at det i frankrig ankede cour d'appels dom til cour de cassation.
the debtor appealed to the Østre landsret, while at the same time appealing to the french cour de cassation against the judgment of the cour d'appel.