Você procurou por: konkurentsieeliselt (Estoniano - Inglês)

Üldkohus oli seisukohal, et vaadeldud juhul ei olnud komisjon sellist tahet kindlaks teinud ning et cda ei saanud tegelikult abi saamisega seotud konkurentsieeliselt jätkuvalt kasu.
the general court considered that such an intention had not been established by the commission in this case and that cda did not retain the actual benefit of the competitive advantage connected with the receipt of the aid granted.

vaata kohtuasja 277/00 smi [2004] ekl i-4355 punkti 86, milles kohus otsustas, et „on kindlasti võimalik, et juhul kui luuakse eraldatud äriühinguid, et jätkata abi saanud ettevõtja tegevust olukorras, kus see ettevõtja on pankrotistunud, võidakse vajaduse korral nõuda asjaomase abi tagasimaksmist ka sellistelt äriühingutelt, kui tehakse kindlaks, et nad saavad tegelikult abi saamisega seotud konkurentsieeliselt jätkuvalt kasu”.
see point 86 of case 277/00 smi [2004] ecr i-4355, in which the court ruled that ‘it is certainly possible that, in the event that hive-off companies are created in order to continue some of the activities of the undertaking that received the aid, where that undertaking has gone bankrupt, those companies may also, if necessary, be required to repay the aid in question, where it is established that they actually continue to benefit from the competitive advantage linked with the receipt of the aid.’