You searched for: in its sole judgement (Danska - Italienska)

otherwise the commission will adopt a decision on the basis of the information in its possession.
otherwise the commission will adopt a decision on the basis of the information in its possession.

in its notification the uk authorities argue correctly that the notified scheme is therefore primarily focussed on investment.
in its notification the uk authorities argue correctly that the notified scheme is therefore primarily focussed on investment.

(14) the company status allows investbx 2 to enter into contracts in its own right.
(14) the company status allows investbx 2 to enter into contracts in its own right.

the complainant claims to have lost several contracts to bt by a small margin due to the incremental tax burden it is obliged to include in its price bid versus bt who has no such incremental burden.
the complainant claims to have lost several contracts to bt by a small margin due to the incremental tax burden it is obliged to include in its price bid versus bt who has no such incremental burden.

with regard to the conclusions of the commission in its decision mentioned above and the fact that the united kingdom has not provided any additional arguments to proof that these funds are private funds, the commission considers that the investments must be regarded as granted through state resources.
with regard to the conclusions of the commission in its decision mentioned above and the fact that the united kingdom has not provided any additional arguments to proof that these funds are private funds, the commission considers that the investments must be regarded as granted through state resources.

(15) in its letters from 30 april 2004 and of 13 december 2004 the united kingdom has stated that the investments should be considered as private investments as slap is a private body and at the time of the investments both the sic and slap had legitimate expectations that the monies involved should be considered as private funds.
(15) in its letters from 30 april 2004 and of 13 december 2004 the united kingdom has stated that the investments should be considered as private investments as slap is a private body and at the time of the investments both the sic and slap had legitimate expectations that the monies involved should be considered as private funds.