Şunu aradınız:: affidavit plaintif (Malayca - İngilizce)

plaintif
plaintiff

affidavit jawapan
supporting affidavit

plaintif; pendakwa
plaintiff

hujahan bertulis plaintif
plaintiff's written argument

hujahan balas bertulis plaintif
legal translation

a letter of affidavit land rental
surat akuan sumpah sewa tanah

tindakan dan/atau kelakuan d1 yang menindas plaintif
the plaintiff responsible i am responsible for managing all matters of administration, management, operations, marketing, sales for d2 companies. meanwhile, d1 is responsible for managing all financial matters, accounts, and purchases for d2 companies.

pengamal penjagaan kesihatan terlatih menyampaikan plaintif sebaliknya kerana ia akan menjadi penghantaran yang sukar
trained healthcare practitioner delivered the plaintiff instead since it will be a difficult delivery

adakah perkataan perkataan tersebut adalah diperhitungkan untuk mengakibatkan plaintif dibenci, dipersenda atau dihina dalam minda seorang yang munasabah
whether the wording of the word is calculated to result in the plaintiff being hated, ridiculed or insulted in the mind of a reasonable person

9. plaintif berhujah dan akan berhujah bahawa defendan telah menggunakan kemudahan smartpay di atas dengan membuat pembelian dan transaksi di stesen servis plaintif
10. for the purpose of the said application, the plaintiff and the defendant had executed the fleetcard cardholder agreement (“the said agreement”). the plaintiff will rely on the said agreement and its full terms and conditions, for its full effect at the trial of the action, where necessary.

perisytiharan bahawa defendan secara tidak sah dan/atau secara salah memasuki atau menyebabkan memasuki tanah plaintif dan memasang atau menyebabkan pemasangan paip pembetung di tanah plaintif atau sebahagiannya secara salah.
an injunction to compel the defendants, its employees, servants and/or agents to restore the plaintiff’s land to its original condition by

9. defendan kemudiannya telah membuat sebahagian pembayaran kepada plaintif sebanyak rm15,000.00 namun masih terdapat jumlah baki yang masih tertunggak kepada plaintif sebanyak rm184,588.76 yang masih terhutang
9. the defendant subsequently made part of the payment to the plaintiff of rm15,000.00 but there was still an outstanding total balance to the plaintiff of rm184,588.76 which was still owed

namun, jika permohonan ini ditolak maka plaintif akan diprejudiskan dalam perbicaraan penuh kelak kerana dihalang daripada membuktikan tuntutan plaintif atas imbangan kebarangkalian dan tidak mampu membuktikan secara mantap pliding berkenaan frod penipuan dan pemalsuan tandatangan, cop serta surat syarikat plaintif kerana tidak dapat memanggil saksi pakar yang berkenaan seperti kehendak seksyen 45 akta keterangan 1950 berikutan dinafikan hak melihat dan mengakses semua dokumen yang dirujuk dalam
however, if this application is rejected then the plaintiff will be prejudiced in the full trial later because he is prevented from proving the plaintiff's claim on the balance of probabilities and is unable to substantiate the pleadings regarding fraudulent fraud and forgery of plaintiff's signature, stamp and company letter because he could not call the relevant expert witnesses. as required by section 45 of the evidence act 1950 following the denial of the right to view and access all documents referred to in

1. jikalau plaintiff sememangnya tidak mempunyai sebarang perlindungan bagi kepentingan hartanah tersebut, kaveat seharusnya dimasukkan pada tahun 2012 dan bukannya hanya pada tahun 2016. pihak defendan menegaskan bahawa ini amat jelas membuktikan bahawa plaintif mempunyai pengetahuan tentang wasiat tersebut dan plaintif tidak berpuashati si mati meninggalkan wasiat atas nama defendan seorang sahaja. oleh itu, defendan menegaskan bahawa ini merupakan satu pemikiran kemudian dan dibuat secara mal
1. if the plaintiff does not have any protection in the interests of the property, the caveat should be included in 2012 and not only in 2016. the defendant argues that this clearly indicates that the plaintiff has knowledge of the will and the plaintiff is not satisfied that the deceased left the will. on behalf of the defendant alone. defendants, therefore, assert that this was a later thought and was made maliciously