Results for having force of law translation from Danish to Polish

the commission will , within five years of the entry into force of this regulation , submit a report to the european parliament and the council on the implementation of this regulation .
the commission will , within five years of the entry into force of this regulation , submit a report to the european parliament and the council on the implementation of this regulation .

from the entry into force of that amendment replacement of fishing gear could be considered eligible if the vessel is subject to a recovery plan and is required to end its participation in the fishery concerned and fish for other species with different fishing gear.
from the entry into force of that amendment replacement of fishing gear could be considered eligible if the vessel is subject to a recovery plan and is required to end its participation in the fishery concerned and fish for other species with different fishing gear.

according to article 12 of the proposed regulation it is envisaged that a report on the implementation of this regulation will be submitted within five years of the entry into force of the regulation , to the european parliament and the council .
according to article 12 of the proposed regulation it is envisaged that a report on the implementation of this regulation will be submitted within five years of the entry into force of the regulation , to the european parliament and the council .

recommendations of the second joint task force of european and other societies on coronary prevention "publiceret i atherosclerosis 140 (1998) 199- 270.
jednakże wpływ na lipidy był większy, kiedy produkt {nazwa produktu leczniczego} i kolestypol podawane były w skojarzeniu, niż kiedy stosowano tylko jeden lek.

(17) first of all, the commission recalls that according to the general principles of law, an exception should be interpreted in a restrictive manner.
(17) first of all, the commission recalls that according to the general principles of law, an exception should be interpreted in a restrictive manner.

49 — jf. navnlig punkt 101, 102 og 138-141 i forslaget til afgørelse. som generaladvokat jacobs har fremhævet, har teorien ligeledes gjort opmærksom på disse vanskeligheder, navnlig j. winter, »the rights of complainants in state aid cases: judicial review of commission decisions adopted under article 88 (ex 93) ec«, common market law review, 1999, nr. 36, s. 521, u. soltész og h. bielesz, »judicial review of state aid decisions«, european competition law review, 2004, s. 133, l. flynn, »remedies in the european courts« i a. biondi m.fl., the law of state aid in the eu, oxford, 2004, s. 283. jf. ligeledes j. azizi, »droits de la défense dans la procédure en matière d’aides d’État: le point de vue judiciaire« i un rôle pour la défense dans les procédures communautaires de concurrence, bruylant, bruxelles, 1997, s. 87, navnlig s. 112-120, g. vandersanden, »pour un élargissement du droit des particuliers d’agir en annulation contre des actes autres que les décisions qui leur sont adressées«, cahiers de droit européen, 1995, nr. 5 og 6, k. lenaerts, »the legal protection of private parties under the ec treaty: a coherent and complete system of judicial review?«, scritti in onore di giuseppe federico mancini, bind ii, diritto dell’unione europea, milano, 1998, b. jankovec og v. kronenberger, »third parties in state aid litigation: locus standi and procedural guarantees« i m. sánchez rydelski, the ec state aid regime: distortive effects of state aid on competition and trade, may, london, 2006, s. 848, a. sinnaeve, »state aid procedures: developments since the entry into force of the procedural regulation«, common market law review 2007, nr. 44, s. 965, og e. coulon og s. cras, »contentieux de la légalité dans le domaine des aides d’État: les récentes évolutions dans l’application des articles 173 et 175 du traité ce«, cahiers de droit européen, 1999, bind 35, nr. 1 og 2, s. 61, navnlig s. 91-110.
49 — zobacz w szczególności pkt 101, 102 i 138–141 tej opinii. jak podkreśla rzecznik generalny f.g. jacobs, na trudności te wskazuje również doktryna, w szczególności: j. winter,the rights of complainants in state aid cases: judicial review of commission decisions adopted under article 88 (ex 93) ec, common market law review, 1999, nr 36, s. 521; u. soltész, i h. bielesz,, „judicial review of state aid decisions”, european competition law review, 2004, s. 133; l. flynn, remedies in the european courts, w: a. biondi i in. (wyd.) the law of state aid in the eu, oxford 2004, s. 283. zobacz także j. azizi, droits de la défense dans la procédure en matière d’aides d’État: le point de vue judiciaire, w: un rôle pour la défense dans les procédures communautaires de concurrence, bruylant, bruxelles 1997, str. 87, w szczególności s. 112–120; g. vandersanden, „pour un élargissement du droit des particuliers d’agir en annulation contre des actes autres que les décisions qui leur sont adressées”, cahiers de droit européen, 1995, nr 5 i 6; k. lenaerts, „the legal protection of private parties under the ec treaty: a coherent and complete system of judicial review?”, scritti in onore di giuseppe federico mancini, vol ii, diritto dell’unione europea, milano 1998; b. jankovec i v. kronenberger, third parties in state aid litigation: locus standi and procedural guarantees, w: m. sánchez rydelski, the ec state aid regime: distortive effects of state aid on competition and trade, may, london 2006, s. 848; a. sinnaeve, state aid procedures: developments since the entry into force of the procedural regulation, common market law review 2007, nr 44, s. 965, jak również e. coulon i s. cras, contentieux de la légalité dans le domaine des aides d’État: les récentes évolutions dans l’application des articles 173 et 175 du traité ce, cahiers de droit européen, 1999, vol 35, nr 1 i 2, s. 61, w szczególności s. 91–110.