From professional translators, enterprises, web pages and freely available translation repositories.
126 of this report.
beslut nr 95.d.76.
Last Update: 2014-02-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
background of this report
bakgrund till rapporten
Last Update: 2017-04-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
the objective of this report
rapportens syfte
Last Update: 2017-04-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
general objective of this report
rapportens syfte
Last Update: 2017-04-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
point 1.1 of this report
punkt 1.1 i rapporten
Last Update: 2017-04-06
Usage Frequency: 5
Quality:
) see chapter i of this report.
(5) se kapitel i i denna rapport. (6) kom(2006) 261. (7) eut l 246, 20.7.2004.
Last Update: 2014-02-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
approach and methodology of this report
rapportens upplägg och metod
Last Update: 2017-04-06
Usage Frequency: 1
Quality:
hence the value of this report.
därför är det här betänkandet så värdefullt.
Last Update: 2012-02-29
Usage Frequency: 2
Quality:
i voted in favour of this report.
jag röstade för detta betänkande.
Last Update: 2012-02-29
Usage Frequency: 15
Quality:
(see section 3.1 of this report.)
(se avsnitt 3.1 i denna rapport.)
Last Update: 2017-04-06
Usage Frequency: 4
Quality:
. we voted in favour of this report.
. vi har röstat för detta betänkande.
Last Update: 2012-02-29
Usage Frequency: 2
Quality:
however, consider the hypocrisy of this report.
lägg dock märke till dubbelmoralen i betänkandet.
Last Update: 2012-02-29
Usage Frequency: 2
Quality:
points 2.3 and 6.1.1 of this report
punkterna 2.3 och 6.1.1 i rapporten
Last Update: 2017-04-06
Usage Frequency: 4
Quality: