プロの翻訳者、企業、ウェブページから自由に利用できる翻訳レポジトリまで。
to know more
to know more
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
good to know ...
good to know ...
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
takes one to know one. mira quién habla.
tager man til at kende en.
最終更新: 2016-10-27
使用頻度: 1
品質:
i need to know about your dating life. por la que deba saber tus citas.
jeg har brug for at vide om din dating liv.
最終更新: 2016-10-27
使用頻度: 1
品質:
bueno es martes, y los martes... "i get to ball the pm on tuesdays"
- tirsdag knalder jeg med ministeren.
最終更新: 2016-10-27
使用頻度: 1
品質:
警告:見えない HTML フォーマットが含まれています
131 « measurement bias in the hipc : what do we know , and what do we need to know ?»
131 « measurement bias in the hicp : what do we know , and what do we need to know ?"
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
警告:見えない HTML フォーマットが含まれています
something that central city needs to know about, the streak. algo sobre lo que central city necesita saber, el rayo.
noget, central city behov for at vide om, the streak.
最終更新: 2016-10-27
使用頻度: 1
品質:
i'm just wondering estoy preguntándome how much of our operation she needs to know about. cuánto necesita saber sobre nuestra operación.
jeg vil gerne vide hvor meget af vores drift hun har brug for at vide om.
最終更新: 2016-10-27
使用頻度: 1
品質:
joe, i want you to know that i'm really serious about iris. joe, quiero que sepas que voy en serio con iris.
joe, jeg vil have dig til at vide, at jeg er virkelig seriøs omkring iris.
最終更新: 2016-10-27
使用頻度: 1
品質:
to protect the institution and its reputation , the ecb needs to know that , as a prospective employee , you have a clean criminal record and have conducted your financial affairs in an honourable and ethical manner .
to protect the institution and its reputation , the ecb needs to know that , as a prospective employee , you have a clean criminal record and have conducted your financial affairs in an honourable and ethical manner .
最終更新: 2011-10-23
使用頻度: 1
品質:
look, dad, i just want you to know mira, papá, solamente quería que supieras that there is nothing that you could do que no hay nada que no puedas hacer that would ever change the way that i look at you.
se, far, jeg vil bare have dig til at vide at der er intet, du kan gøre , der ville nogensinde ændre den måde at jeg ser på dig.
最終更新: 2016-10-27
使用頻度: 1
品質:
the main issue in this exercise is to know how to use the "double rule of three", that you have already seen here, in case something similar may appear in your tests. on the other hand, to save time in finding the rig t answer, if your alternatives were a bit more complicated, for example: a) it is 15% higher than the rent on martina's apartment. b) it is 45% higher than the rent on martina's apartment. c) it is 65% higher than the rent on martina's apartment. d) it is 85% higher than the rent on martina's apartment. e) none of the above statements is correct. i would recommend calculating first the weight of klaus' rent on martina's rent, simply by dividing them: 1800 / 900 = 2 this means, 1 + 1, or 100% + 100%, so 100% increase. or let us imagine that the two rents were 1200 and 900, then: 1200 / 900 = 1.33 this means, 1 + 0.33, or 100% + 33%, so 33% increase. this way, you are able to quickly match the real increase against the answer options, without having to calculate the increase proposed in every option. 84
we must compare it with the rent on martina's apartment. moreover, we find a last option "none of the above statements is correct", forcing us to check, one by one, if any of them is right. let us do it: a) it is half the rent on martina's apartment. is the rent on klaus' apartment (1800 euros) half the rent on martina's apartment (900 euros)? obviously not - it is double the rent, in fact. b) it is 100 euros less than the rent on martinapartment. again incorrect - it is 900 euros higher than the rent on martina's apartment. c) it is 50% higher than the rent on martina's apartment. here we should increase 50% the rent on martina's apartment to check if this is right. so: 900 * (1 + 0. 5) = 900 * 1.5 = 1350 or if you prefer working with percentages: 900 + (900 * 50%) = 1350 we can see that 1800 is much higher than martina's rent increased 50%, so it is incorrect too. d) it is 100% higher than the rent on martina's apartment. we may increase 100% the rent on martina's apartment to check if this is right. increasing 100% any value means to double it (that is, multiplying by 2), but still you can follow our usual method to ensure: 900 * (1 + 1) = 900 * 2 = 1800 or working with percentages: 900 + (900 * 100%) = 1800 we can see that 1800 is exactly martina's rent increased 100%, so the right answer is option d). 83
最終更新: 2021-03-15
使用頻度: 1
品質:
参照:
警告:見えない HTML フォーマットが含まれています