검색어: above (스페인어 - 카탈로니아어)

90 % or above
90 % o més

70 % and above / / a
70 % i més / / a

en issue above par
en issue above par

beneficiario : above time sl .
beneficiari : above time , sl .

doce%1 the hour translated above
dotze_bar_/ _bar_$[ propietats de 'de dotze' de- horames 'd\\' una ']% 1 the hour translated above

%1 y diez%1 the hour translated above
% 1 i deu% 1 the hour translated above

%1 en punto%1 the hour translated above
% 1 en punt% 1 the hour translated above

first class with distinction / / 75 % and above
first class with distinction / / 75 % and above

Énfasis : above all ; chiefly ; with attention to ...
Èmfasi : above all ; chiefly ; with attention to .

tiempo sidéreo localthe angle of an object above (or below) the horizon
temps sideral localthe angle of an object above (or below) the horizon

¡fin de semana! whether to uppercase the first letter of completed fuzzy time strings above: translate as 1 if yes, 0 if no.
cap de setmana! whether to uppercase the first letter of completed fuzzy time strings above: translate as 1 if yes, 0 if no.

now we know that the percentage of family units with children in 2010 was 64%. let us analyse the following sentence of our question: in 2010, there was 360 000 family units with no children. this information could be useful if we needed to convert our percentages to calculate the actual number of family units for any category, or the total number of family units in france. but in this exercise, we just need to obtain a result in percentage (checking our answer options), and we already have our calculations in percentage format, so this new data is completely useless for us and it is the big pitfall that we mentioned above: if you try to include it in your calculations somehow, you will probably be lost soon and get a wrong result. finally, we can answer the question of this exercise: what was the percentage of family units with no children in 20102 knowing that the percentage of family units with children in 2010 was 64%, we can deduce that the rest of family units were family units with no children, so: 100% - 64% = 36% this implies that the right answer option here is a). my advice this exercise is a good example of how numerical reasoning is more important than calculations in most epso questions. we could have even 101
enroscad