Je was op zoek naar: logarithmic (Tjechisch - Engels)

however such reasoning is still not pertinent since the effect of co2 is logarithmic and not linear.
however such reasoning is still not pertinent since the effect of co2 is logarithmic and not linear.

the logarithmic decline of influence with increased concentration shows that co2 has even less effect at the higher current level.
the logarithmic decline of influence with increased concentration shows that co2 has even less effect at the higher current level.

second, the logarithmic nature of the greenhouse effect is a red herring, at least for small perturbations.
second, the logarithmic nature of the greenhouse effect is a red herring, at least for small perturbations.

your discussion of the logarithmic dependence of the greenhouse effect on greenhouse gas concentrations tells us one reason why this runaway warming is not easily triggered.
your discussion of the logarithmic dependence of the greenhouse effect on greenhouse gas concentrations tells us one reason why this runaway warming is not easily triggered.

logarithmic z (logaritmické z): toto nastavení může pomoct, když je někdy grafika ve hře "průhledná".
logarithmic z: this setting may help when some of the games graphics are "see through".

this exponential relationship between emissions and concentration essentially cancels the logarithmic relationship between concentration and warming, so that the relationship between total emissions and warming is more or less linear.
this exponential relationship between emissions and concentration essentially cancels the logarithmic relationship between concentration and warming, so that the relationship between total emissions and warming is more or less linear.

some things that might save us, as you point out, are the logarithmic nature of the greenhouse effects from the various greenhouse gases, and the diminishing returns positive feedback phenomenon.
some things that might save us, as you point out, are the logarithmic nature of the greenhouse effects from the various greenhouse gases, and the diminishing returns positive feedback phenomenon.

what i want to emphasize here is that the logarithmic proportionality of radiative forcing to atmospheric co2 level has nothing directly to do with whether or not there are positive or negative feedbacks to radiative forcing or whether tipping points might be crossed as radiative forcing is changed.
what i want to emphasize here is that the logarithmic proportionality of radiative forcing to atmospheric co2 level has nothing directly to do with whether or not there are positive or negative feedbacks to radiative forcing or whether tipping points might be crossed as radiative forcing is changed.

my point was that, within some range of conditions, the tropopause level the radiative forcing by co2 (integrated over all wavelengths and directions) can be approximated with a logarithmic relationship.
my point was that, within some range of conditions, the tropopause level the radiative forcing by co2 (integrated over all wavelengths and directions) can be approximated with a logarithmic relationship.

as i just mentioned above somewhere, the logarithmic proportionality of radiative forcing to co2 level is an approximation that does not apply indefinitely - specifically, at low enough co2 level, the relationship will be closer to linear.
as i just mentioned above somewhere, the logarithmic proportionality of radiative forcing to co2 level is an approximation that does not apply indefinitely - specifically, at low enough co2 level, the relationship will be closer to linear.

because net air-to-air radiative transfer requires intermediate opacity - sufficient transmissivity for temperature variations to be visible to each other, but sufficient opacity for the layers of air to be visible from any distance - and because the region of intermediate opacity for co2 corresponds to the sides of the band, in between the central saturated portion and the edges of significant opacity, and these regions merely shift outward from the center with increasing co2 when in the logarithmic regime, the radiative effects of changing co2 level are mainly on direct net radiative energy transfer between the surface and the air, from the air to space, and from the surface to space - except where the spectrum of co2 overlaps with water vapor or other agents - increasing co2 will affect the radiative fluxes involving clouds, for example.
because net air-to-air radiative transfer requires intermediate opacity - sufficient transmissivity for temperature variations to be visible to each other, but sufficient opacity for the layers of air to be visible from any distance - and because the region of intermediate opacity for co2 corresponds to the sides of the band, in between the central saturated portion and the edges of significant opacity, and these regions merely shift outward from the center with increasing co2 when in the logarithmic regime, the radiative effects of changing co2 level are mainly on direct net radiative energy transfer between the surface and the air, from the air to space, and from the surface to space - except where the spectrum of co2 overlaps with water vapor or other agents - increasing co2 will affect the radiative fluxes involving clouds, for example.