You searched for: madoff (Maltesiska - Engelska)

il-każ madoff qajjem diversi kwistjonijiet importanti fir-rigward tal-fondi ucits.
the madoff case raised several important issues in relation to ucits funds.

il-każ ta’ madoff iqajjem ukoll il-kwistjoni ta’ kunflitti ta’ interess.
the madoff case also raises the issue of conflicts of interest.

il-każ madoff wera d-differenza fundamentali bejn l-istandards tar-responsabbiltà stretta u tan-negliġenza.
the madoff case demonstrated the fundamental difference between strict liability and negligence standards.

f'każ minnhom, fond partikolari li serva bħala fond ta’ alimentazzjoni għal madoff tilef madwar eur 1.4 biljun.
in one instance, a particular fund that acted as a feeder fund for madoff lost around € 1.4 billion.

b'mod partikolari, il-konsegwenzi tal-frodi madoff kienu partikolarment gravi f'xi stati membri tal-ue.
in particular, the consequences of the madoff fraud have been particularly acute in some eu member states.

fil-każ madoff, il-qrati nazzjonali fl-istati membri differenti ħadu approċċi differenti meta ddeċidew jekk il-kustodju prinċipali ta’ fond ucits kienx responsabbli biex irodd lura l-assi ta' fondi li ntilfu meta kienu miżmuma f’sottokustodja.
in the madoff case, national courts in different member states took different approaches when deciding whether the principal custodian of a ucits fund was liable for the return of fund assets that were lost while held in sub-custody.